2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-018-3737-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Copper-catalyzed cyclopropanation reaction of but-2-ene

Abstract: The mechanism of the copper(I)-catalyzed cyclopropanation reaction for methyl diazoacetate with both (Z)- and (E)-but-2-ene stereoisomers has been studied using the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set by means of M06-2X and O3LYP functionals. According to both methods, the rate-limiting step is the formation of a copper-carbene intermediate, formed by association between methyl diazoacetate and bis(acetonitrile)-copper(I) ion with the concomitant extrusion of dinitrogen. Cis/trans diastereoselectivity for the cyclopropana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to understand the difference in modification yields by the two catalysts, it is important to consider the mechanistical pathways of the Cu(I)‐catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions. [ 30–31 ] After an initial formation of a precatalyst due to the affinity of the active Cu(I) catalyst for the unsaturated substrate [ 15,29–30,32–34 ] (see Scheme 2, III ), the cyclopropanation proceeds further via complexation of a metal and a carbene ( VI ), formed by expelling N 2 from the diazo compound ( V → VI ), which is considered as the rate determining step. [ 15 ] The ring closing step itself is known to proceed either via a one‐step concerted pathway ( VII ) as a direct‐carbene insertion, or via a two‐step process, proceeding by a metallocyclobutane intermediate ( VIII ), [ 29,32,35 ] depending on the diazo compound, the ligand (L n ) and the transition metal (M).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to understand the difference in modification yields by the two catalysts, it is important to consider the mechanistical pathways of the Cu(I)‐catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions. [ 30–31 ] After an initial formation of a precatalyst due to the affinity of the active Cu(I) catalyst for the unsaturated substrate [ 15,29–30,32–34 ] (see Scheme 2, III ), the cyclopropanation proceeds further via complexation of a metal and a carbene ( VI ), formed by expelling N 2 from the diazo compound ( V → VI ), which is considered as the rate determining step. [ 15 ] The ring closing step itself is known to proceed either via a one‐step concerted pathway ( VII ) as a direct‐carbene insertion, or via a two‐step process, proceeding by a metallocyclobutane intermediate ( VIII ), [ 29,32,35 ] depending on the diazo compound, the ligand (L n ) and the transition metal (M).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to understand the difference in modification yields by the two catalysts, it is important to consider the mechanistical pathways of the Cu(I)-catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions. [30][31] After an initial formation of a precatalyst due to the affinity of the active Cu(I) catalyst for the unsaturated substrate [15,[29][30][32][33][34] (see Scheme 2, III), the cyclopropanation proceeds further via complexation of a metal and a carbene (VI), formed by expelling N 2 from the diazo compound (V ! VI), which is considered as the rate determining step.…”
Section: Cu(i)-catalyzed Cyclopropanation Of Pi With Diazoacetatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation