Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft in the Treatment of Class I Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Cortês, Antonieta de Queiróz; Martins, Ângela Guimarães; Nociti, Francisco Humberto; Sallum, Antônio Wilson; Casati, Márcio Z.; Sallum, Enílson Antônio

doi:10.1902/jop.2004.75.8.1137

Cited by 72 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[12] Although several techniques have been proposed to achieve consistent and predictable root coverage, by some estimates, the average percentage of covered root surfaces resulting from different procedures performed under varying clinical conditions varies from 56% to 97.8%. [3–6] Thus, treatment of buccal recession remains a major challenge to clinicians.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[2] However, it involves a certain degree of discomfort for the patient because of two surgical sites (palatal donor and recepient sites). A study evaluated the treatment of localized gingival recession by CPF (test) with or without an SCTG (control).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In vitro and clinical studies suggested that ADMA is an acellular, non-immunogenic scaffold that heals by repopulation and revascularization, rather than through a granulation process. [2] Previous studies compared the results obtained with ADMA and the SCTG for the treatment of gingival recessions. None of them showed any significant differences in recession reduction between the procedures.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, a study has shown that the SCTG produced a greater mean probing reduction and mean keratinized tissue increase than the ADMA. [28]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study

Jagannathachary

Prakash

2010

Contemp Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the randomized controlled single blind study is to evaluate the treatment of Miller's class II gingival recessions by coronally positioned flap (CPF) with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA). Ten patients with 20 sites with maxillary bilateral Miller's class II facial recession defects were selected randomly into two groups of test (ADMA+CPF) and control (CPF alone) group with each group having 10 recession defects to be treated. The clinical parameters included plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession height (RH), recession width (RW), height of the keratinized tissue (HKT), and thickness of the keratinized tissue (TKT). These measurements were recorded at baseline and after 6 months post-surgery. Statistical analysis was made by the paired “t” test for intragroup and intergroup comparison was done by the unpaired “t” test. The percentage of root coverage for both the experimental and control groups were 82.2% and 50%, respectively. The changes from baseline to 6 months were significant in both the groups for PD, CAL, and RH; however, for parameters such as RW, HKT, and TKT significance was seen only in the experimental group. On comparison between two groups, only TKT showed statistically significance. It can be concluded that the amount of root coverage obtained with ADMA + CPF was superior compared to CPF alone.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, a study has shown that the SCTG produced a greater mean probing reduction and mean keratinized tissue increase than the ADMA. [28]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study

Jagannathachary

Prakash

2010

Contemp Clin Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En otros estudios (17,18) , se ha comparado el CDC sólo y el CDC + MDA. A los 6 meses, no se observaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a recubrimiento radicular, pero sí se encontró un aumento significativo en el aumento de grosor de la encía en el grupo tratado con MDA.…”

Section: Matriz Dérmica Acelular (Mda) Vs Colgajo Desplazado Coronalunclassified

Aplicación de biomateriales de base biológica, moléculas bioactivas e ingeniería de tejidos en cirugía plástica periodontal: Una revisión

Yaneth

Alarcón

Velásquez³

2012

Rev. Clin. Periodoncia Implantol. Rehabil. Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of recession-type defects

Sukekava

Araújo

Pustiglioni

et al. 2008

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Coronally Positioned Flap With or Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft in the Treatment of Class I Gingival Recessions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study

Abstract: It can be concluded that both techniques could provide significant root coverage in Class I gingival recessions; however, a greater keratinized tissue thickness can be expected with ADM.

Cited by 72 publications

References 30 publications

Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study

Coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of class II gingival recession defects: A randomized controlled clinical study

Aplicación de biomateriales de base biológica, moléculas bioactivas e ingeniería de tejidos en cirugía plástica periodontal: Una revisión

Root coverage procedures for the treatment of recession-type defects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About