1968
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196809000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction of Prominent Ears by Concha-Mastoid Sutures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
91
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…To decrease the risk of possible complications, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative detailed planning and execution of surgery are essential (9-11). The most frequent complications are wound infection, hematoma, chondritis, malposition of the ear and recurrence of the abnormality (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To decrease the risk of possible complications, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative detailed planning and execution of surgery are essential (9-11). The most frequent complications are wound infection, hematoma, chondritis, malposition of the ear and recurrence of the abnormality (12)(13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] The conchal setback technique was described by Furnas in the late 1960s and involves the use of permanent sutures to narrow a large space between the concha and mastoid process. [6] As this method does not address the antihelix, it was advocated by Furnas "when excessive cupping of the concha is the only cause for prominence of an ear." Small ellipses of skin are removed from the postauricular surface and mastoid, and three or more permanent sutures are then passed between the conchal cartilage and deep mastoid fascia and periosteum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conchal setback is an effective maneuver in the appropriate patient, but proper suture location is imperative or impingement of the external auditory canal may result. [6] In contrast to the anterior approach, the suture otoplasty from the posterior approach causes some effacement of the postauricular sulcus and leaves a scar that is longer and often less refined than the anterior conchal scars. However, these flaws are hidden from view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A secondary incision in the dorsal side of the scapha is sometimes required to fully correct the shape and angle of the ear. Incision is made directly with a high-fluence surgical narrow beam CO 2 laser (10,600 nm wavelength), layer by layer; the posterior auricular muscle is transected, and excessive retroauricular subcutaneous fat and connective tissue is removed up to an epi-perichondral level, completely sparing the temporal fascial, and the posterior aspect of the cartilage in a caudal direction up to the mastoid plane is prepared (Figure 8) [29].…”
Section: Dermatologic Surgery and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%