Correction: Ronzon, T., et al. Developments of Economic Growth and Employment in Bioeconomy Sectors across the EU. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4507

Abstract

The authors would like to make the following corrections to the published paper [...]

Forest carbon and a regional perspective on the effectiveness of financial instruments within the forest bioeconomy

“…Nonetheless, innovative sectors are also included, namely bioenergy, biofuels, biotextiles, and biochemicals while their significance is strengthening over time (Ronzon et al 2017). The study presented by Ronzon et al (2015) segregates the national economies under (i) agricultural bioeconomies, (ii) agro-food industry and biobased chemical industries, (iii) forest bioeconomies, and (iv) non-specialised bioeconomies.…”

“…The tree species compo-https://doi.org/10.17221/24/2024-JFS sition contains a significant proportion of spruce (48.1%), pine (16%), beech (9.3%), and oak (7.6%). The Czech Republic clusters into the non-specialised bioeconomy (Ronzon et al 2015). However, social (Hájek et al 2021;Perunová, Zimmermannová 2022) and economic aspects (Perunová, Zimmermannová 2023) of the forest bioeconomy can be seen.…”

Evaluation of the Biomass Energy Production Potential in Agricultural Holdings in Relation to Their Size. Case Study for COP Farms in Romania

“…Crop residues are estimated to be formed in a proportion of 41% of wheat straw, 21% of sugar beet residues, 14% barley straw, 10% of maize stover, 4% rye residues, and 10% other agricultural residues. However, scientific literature indicates that the main sources of residues remain straw and stover from grain crops (wheat, barley, and maize), but also that around 70% of crops residues are not used in the economy as biomass and those unused residues are composed of 71% of cereal residues and 16% of oilseeds residues (Ronzon et al, 2015). Renewability and versatility are, among many other aspects, important advantages of biomass as an energy source.…”