2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-023-08360-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Comparing the performance of dengue virus IgG and IgG-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in seroprevalence study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Outperformed RDT in accuracy. Tsai et al, 2023 24 Performance Evaluation ELISA, IgG-capture ELISA DENV IgG ELISA, and IgG-capture ELISA 232 serum or plasma samples, including late-convalesce ZIKV samples from Brazil. IgG ELISA Sensitivity: 94.9%; IgG ELISA Specificity: 100%; IgG-capture ELISA Sensitivity: 18.6%; IgG-capture ELISA Specificity: 100%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outperformed RDT in accuracy. Tsai et al, 2023 24 Performance Evaluation ELISA, IgG-capture ELISA DENV IgG ELISA, and IgG-capture ELISA 232 serum or plasma samples, including late-convalesce ZIKV samples from Brazil. IgG ELISA Sensitivity: 94.9%; IgG ELISA Specificity: 100%; IgG-capture ELISA Sensitivity: 18.6%; IgG-capture ELISA Specificity: 100%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%