Correction to: Ex situ reconstruction of comminuted radial head fractures: is it truly worth a try?

Abstract

The original version of this article unfortunately contained a mistake. The second sentence in the second paragraph of the discussion section reports "Businger et al. [18] found excellent results in two patients with on table reconstruction who demonstrated an average range of motion of 0°-6°-141° for extension-flexion and an average MEPS of 99.2 points." The correct sentence should be: "Businger et al. [18] found excellent results in six patients with on table reconstruction who demonstrated an average range of motion of 0°-6°-141° for extension-flexion and an average MEPS of 99.2 points." Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.The original article can be found online at https ://doi.