2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01295-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: Preventing Peterson’s space hernia using a BIO synthetic mesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While closing MD has now clearly been established as a mandatory step at completion of RYGB, the precise technique for closure is still debated. The use of a mesh to reinforce closure has even been described [29,30]. As others, and despite systematic closure of all MD as of the beginning of our experience with laparoscopic RYGB, we have observed a high incidence of IH initially (12.9%), which led us to adjust the closing technique to improve permanent closure and reduce the risk of IH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While closing MD has now clearly been established as a mandatory step at completion of RYGB, the precise technique for closure is still debated. The use of a mesh to reinforce closure has even been described [29,30]. As others, and despite systematic closure of all MD as of the beginning of our experience with laparoscopic RYGB, we have observed a high incidence of IH initially (12.9%), which led us to adjust the closing technique to improve permanent closure and reduce the risk of IH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This risk is probably lower with running sutures provided the bites are not too far apart. In the past, even the use of mesh has been suggested to increase adhesions at the MD [29,30]. We are convinced that materials such as braided non-absorbable sutures that create more inflammation, hence more adhesions, at the MD, are efficient and more likely to result in permanent closure than monofilaments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kristensen et al (3) analiza el cierre o no de los DM utilizando clips (3) , obteniendo resultados estadísticamente significativos a favor del cierre. En 2021, Skidmore et al (9) publica un estudio retrospectivo donde compara diferentes materiales, sutura irreabsorbible, pegamento y una combinación de sutura no absorbible y malla biológica. Defiende el uso de la malla para el cierre del espacio de Petersen, pero describe complicaciones en el cierre de la brecha mesentérica con riesgo de HI y oclusión intestinal por adherencias.…”
Section: Discusiónunclassified