Correction to: The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

Kanehara, Akiko; Kotake, Risa; Miyamoto, Yuki; Kumakura, Yousuke; Morita, Kentaro; Ishiura, Tomoko; Shimizu, Kimiko; Fujieda, Yumiko; Ando, Shuntaro; Kondō, Shinsuke; Kasai, Kiyoto

doi:10.1186/s12888-020-2430-y

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies indicated that recovery-promoting factors include close relationships, social support, and positive support from mental health services [8,9]. In our study, in addition to support and recoveryoriented practices, which were also found in previous studies, having positive childhood experiences was extracted as an original recovery-promoting factor in our study.…”

Section: Recovery-promoting Factorssupporting

confidence: 77%

“…Previous studies indicated that recovery-promoting factors include close relationships, social support, and positive support from mental health services [8,9]. In addition to those themes, the theme of positive childhood experiences was extracted in our study.…”

Section: Recovery-promoting Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the recovery-promoting factors, multiple items have been identified in qualitative studies and literature reviews. For example, one systematic review indicated that recovery-promoting factors included (1) adjustment, coping, and reappraisal; (2) responding to the illness; and (3) social support, close relationships, and belonging [8]. Another systematic review identified five factors: (1) social support, (2) faith and spirituality, (3) personal agency and hope, (4) environmental resources, and (5) positive support and holistic care from services [9].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Culture-dependent and universal constructs and promoting factors for the process of personal recovery in users of mental health services: qualitative findings from Japan

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The conceptualization of personal recovery began in Europe and North America and has spread worldwide. However, the concept of personal recovery in addition to recovery-promoting factors may be influenced by culture. We explored how users of mental health services in Japan perceive their own personal recovery and the factors that promote it. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews with individuals using mental health services. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis with a grouped framework analysis approach. We used a coding framework based on the existing CHIME framework (connectedness, hope and optimism about the future, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment). Results Data were obtained from 30 users of mental health services (mean age: 40.4 years; 46.7% women; 50.0% with schizophrenia). “Compassion for others” was newly extracted in “Connectedness”, and “Rebuilding/redefining identity not being as shaped by social norms” was newly extracted in “Identity” as personal recovery. “Positive experiences in childhood” (including positive parenting support from neighbours) was newly extracted as a recovery-promoting factor. Conclusions Our unique findings on the rebuilding identity/defining identity free from conformity to social norms due to interactions with familiar people, including peers, may be culture dependent. This study raises overarching questions regarding how socio-cultural values influence the development of identity and personal values and how they are in turn reflected in personal recovery.

show abstract

Section: Recovery-promoting Factorssupporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Recovery-promoting Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Culture-dependent and universal constructs and promoting factors for the process of personal recovery in users of mental health services: qualitative findings from Japan

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A shortened version of 15 items of the QPR (QPR-15) showed better psychometric properties than the original version ( Law et al, 2014 ). The original English version has been validated in Chinese ( Chien and Chan, 2013 ), Swedish ( Argentzell et al, 2017 ), and Japanese ( Kanehara et al, 2017 , 2020 ), and the 15-item version has been adapted in Spanish (QPR-15-SP) ( Goodman-Casanova et al, 2022 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric validation of the 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP)

Goodman-Casanova,

Cuesta-Lozano,

Alupoaei

et al. 2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionReliable and valid instruments are needed to measure the impact of mental health services and programs on the journeys of recovery of service users. The aim of this study was to explore the psychometric properties of the cross-culturally adapted 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP).MethodsOne hundred and ten participants from three locations in Spain (Málaga, Barcelona and Madrid), who were users of primary and specialized mental health services, were interviewed from October 2021 to June 2022.ResultsThe internal consistency obtained was excellent: ω =.93 and α =.92. Temporal reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients was moderate (ICC=.684, p <.000). Regarding convergent validity, the QPR-15-SP had a moderate correlation with the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) (ρ =-.500, p <.000), a Visual Numeric Recovery Scale (VNRS) (ρ =.591, p <.000), and the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI) (r =.566, p <.000). Correlations between advanced stages of recovery and higher QPR-15-SP scores were found (Moratorium: ρ =-.579, p <.000; Awareness: ρ =-.130, p =.189; Preparation: r =-.043, P=.665; Rebuilding: r =.460, p <.000; Growth: ρ =.697, p <.000). In terms of divergent validity, the QPR-15-SP had low correlation with the DUKE-UNC Functional Social Support Scale (ρ =.273, p <.005). The confirmatory factor analysis of the 1-factor structure obtained reasonable goodness of fit indexes.DiscussionThe QPR-15-SP has acceptable psychometric properties, providing support for measuring recovery in Spain and allowing international comparison research.

show abstract

“…Additionally, programs aimed toward recovery similar to those developed in the west, such as Assertive Community Treatment, Wellness Recovery Action Plan, Illness Management and Recovery, and Recovery College are widely practiced in Japan [10][11][12][13][14]. For the evaluation of practice, the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of recovery-related scales in which service users measure their personal recovery and service providers measure their recovery knowledge and attitude have been verified [15][16][17][18][19][20]. As described above, programs including personal recovery are being used.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Supporting personal recovery in people with mental health difficulties is central to mental health services. This study aimed to develop the Japanese version of INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted from October to December 2015. The authors asked users to participate in the survey of 14 community mental health services in the Kanto region of Japan. The service users completed self-administered questionnaires that include the Japanese version of INSPIRE, the Recovery Assessment Scale, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, the patient version of the Scale to Assess Therapeutic Relationship in Community Mental Health care and the Short Form Health Survey. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa. Convergent validity was examined by assessing correlation with other scales. Factor validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with generalized least-squares mean and oblimin rotation. In addition, confirmatory factor analysis was used to check the fitness of the factor structure models derived from the EFA. Results: A total of 195 out of 212 users gave written informed consent and participated in the study. Data from 190 respondents were analyzed (response rate 89.6%). INSPIRE, Brief INSPIRE, and the subscales all showed Cronbach's alpha coefficient over 0.78. ICC and weighted kappa derived more than 0.92 for subscales and Brief INSPIRE. These numerical values indicated good reliability. The convergent validity of Brief INSPIRE and the subscales was significantly positively correlated with the other scales. Different from the previous study, the factor structure was extracted using EFA. Both factor structures were checked by CFA, but the degree of fitness index was not good in either. Therefore, the factor analysis did not show goodness of fit. Conclusions: This study found the Japanese version of INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE to be reliable and valid for use among community mental health service users in Japan.

show abstract

Correction to: The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing

Abstract: After publication of our article [1] we were notified that the 5-point Likert-type scale in Additional file 1 needs to change from “1 to 5” to “0 to 4”. The updated Additional file 1 is included in this correction.

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

Culture-dependent and universal constructs and promoting factors for the process of personal recovery in users of mental health services: qualitative findings from Japan

Culture-dependent and universal constructs and promoting factors for the process of personal recovery in users of mental health services: qualitative findings from Japan

Psychometric validation of the 15-item Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery in Spain (QPR-15-SP)

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in community mental health service users in Japan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About