2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4715-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correction to: The use of PIPAC (pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy) in gynecological oncology: a statement by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie (AGO) Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, North-Eastern German Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (NOGGO), AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the definite role of this novel therapy as an alternative to the existing treatment options has still to be established. It remains an experimental treatment modality and should not be performed outside the framework of prospective, controlled studies, as stressed by the AGO [108]. The results of ongoing randomized trials comparing systemic chemotherapy with PI-PAC in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer are eagerly awaited [109,110].…”
Section: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the definite role of this novel therapy as an alternative to the existing treatment options has still to be established. It remains an experimental treatment modality and should not be performed outside the framework of prospective, controlled studies, as stressed by the AGO [108]. The results of ongoing randomized trials comparing systemic chemotherapy with PI-PAC in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer are eagerly awaited [109,110].…”
Section: Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%