2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40462-017-0103-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlated velocity models as a fundamental unit of animal movement: synthesis and applications

Abstract: BackgroundContinuous time movement models resolve many of the problems with scaling, sampling, and interpretation that affect discrete movement models. They can, however, be challenging to estimate, have been presented in inconsistent ways, and are not widely used.MethodsWe review the literature on integrated Ornstein-Uhlenbeck velocity models and propose four fundamental correlated velocity movement models (CVM’s): random, advective, rotational, and rotational-advective. The models are defined in terms of bio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
93
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal behavior and physiology, however, changes across temporal and spatial scales, and attraction or avoidance of different habitats is unquestionably dynamic. Although this is widely recognized (Thurfjell et al, 2014; Hooten et al, 2014; Avgar et al, 2016; Gurarie et al, 2017), behavioral changes are rarely accounted for in any habitat selection analyses, including SSFs, due to the additional complexity models require to capture the non-stationary condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal behavior and physiology, however, changes across temporal and spatial scales, and attraction or avoidance of different habitats is unquestionably dynamic. Although this is widely recognized (Thurfjell et al, 2014; Hooten et al, 2014; Avgar et al, 2016; Gurarie et al, 2017), behavioral changes are rarely accounted for in any habitat selection analyses, including SSFs, due to the additional complexity models require to capture the non-stationary condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In increasing order of complexity, these include a pure random walk (Wiener process; e.g. see (McClintock et al 2014)), a linear-and angular-velocity-biased random walk (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, (Gurarie et al 2017)), and location salient random walk (e.g., walks in a force field, (Magdziarz et al 2012); or movement dependent on the local landscape, (Harris and Blackwell 2013)), where the location itself could be a function of time (e.g., the centroid of a moving group-see (Langrock et al 2014)). The second is to use rule-based simulations of movement over rectangularly or hexangonally rasterized landscapes without the benefit of a compact underlying differential equation structure (Getz et al 2015, del Mar Delgado et al 2018 Our path simulation algorithm of the movement of individuals over landscapes is an outgrowth of Brownian motion (Pozdnyakov et al 2014), correlated random walks (Kareiva and Shigesada 1983) and, even Levy walks (Benhamou 2007) simulation methods.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we interpolate the trajectory it is not clear how we would obtain the corresponding Y i measurements at these interpolated locations, other than using a method such as kriging, which may dilute any preferential effect that was present in the original data. Another option may be to use thinning (Gurarie et al, 2017), however we wanted to avoid this in our application in this paper, due to the limited temporal resolution of the data to which we have access. We term this model the "preferential correlated random walk" (PCRW) model and assume that the sampling locations X(t 1 ), .…”
Section: A Preferential Movement Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter Estimates. Note that because of the way the data was generated (by subsampling trajectories created on a relatively fine time scale), the estimated movement parameters may not correspond to their nominal values used to create the data (Gurarie et al, 2017). Hence, we report here results for the estimates of the parameters of the spatial process.…”
Section: Relationship Between the Movement Model And Likelihood Integmentioning
confidence: 99%