Correlates of procrastination and performance at work: The role of having “good fit”

Metin, U. Baran; Peeters, Maria C. W.; Taris, Toon W.

doi:10.1080/10852352.2018.1470187

Cited by 62 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies on procrastination conclude that procrastination brings undesired effects on individuals, such as low well-being and work performances, in both education institutions and workplaces (Malatincova´, 2015;Metin et al, 2018;Orpen, 1998a;Pearlman-avnion & Zibenberg, 2018;Van Eerde, 2003). However, the effect of procrastination on employees' and students' achievement was found to be interacted with psychological states, personality and other organizational aspects (Grund & Fries, 2018b;Hicks et al, 2015;Metin et al, 2016).…”

Section: Procrastinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study proposes that the theory tends to be consistent, both in the education and the work setting. By considering some previous findings about procrastination (Meirav, 2018;Pearlman-avnion & Zibenberg, 2018), the antecedents (Senécal et al, 1995;Van Eerde, 2003;Van Eerde & Klingsieck, 2018) and its effects on both academic and work performance (Kim et al, 2017;Metin et al, 2018;Ryung & Hee, 2015;Saele et al, 2017), The following Figure 1 shows this study's theoretical model: Following the Self-Regulation theory, people need PsyCap to maximise their executive function (regulation). This study predicts that PsyCap can leverage students' academic achievement and employees' performance by reducing the procrastination impact on their performances.…”

Section: The Relationship Between Variables and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The effect of procrastination on employees and organizational outcomes has been studied by some scholars (Meirav, 2018;Metin et al, 2018Metin et al, , 2016Pearlman-avnion & Zibenberg, 2018). A study showed that procrastination was not only experienced by students, but also by the teachers who neglected their duties (Meirav, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Examining the impact of psychological capital on academic achievement and work performance: The roles of procrastination and conscientiousness

Saman

Wirawan

2021

Cogent Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed at investigating the effect of Psychological Capital (PsyCap) on students' academic achievement and employees' performance through procrastination at different levels of conscientiousness. The proposed theoretical model was examined using a moderated-mediation regression technique. The first group of participants comprised 1,670 university students from four major universities in the city of Makassar. Most of them were female (73.7%) with ages ranged from 17 to 24. The second group consisted of 400 employees (female, 57.5%) from five major organisations representing both private and public sectors in Makassar. The findings suggested that the students' PsyCap had a negative direct impact on academic procrastination, but procrastination did not significantly impact students' cumulative Grade-Point Average (GPA). The negative effect of PsyCap on students' ABOUT THE AUTHORS

show abstract

Section: Procrastinationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Relationship Between Variables and Hypothesesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Examining the impact of psychological capital on academic achievement and work performance: The roles of procrastination and conscientiousness

Saman

Wirawan

2021

Cogent Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A particular study devised an application to minimize employees' procrastination rate (Teng & Sun 2019). Another study tried to reduce procrastination by balancing the schedule (Richardson, 2018) A different article emphasized the position of having an appropriate fit between employment settings and employees (Metin et al, 2018).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Procrastination and Work Productivity of Academic Staff: Implications to the Institution

Asio¹

2021

ash

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Procrastination in the academic institution is not new since it prevails from students even to staff. This might create problems, especially in the individual’s output. This study analyzed the relationship, procrastination level, and the work productivity of academic staff from a tertiary education institution in Central Luzon, Philippines. Using a convenience sampling technique, 70 academic staff took part in the survey. This study used a descriptive-correlational design with an adapted questionnaire from McCloskey (2011) and Buuri (2015) as an instrument. For the statistical analysis, the study used SPSS 23 to analyze the gathered data. The study found that the academic staff “often” subject themselves to procrastination, and they “agree” that they are productive in their work. There were significant differences found in the procrastination level and work productivity of the academic staff when grouped according to sex, civil status, and years in service. In terms of relationship, the study confirmed a low direct relationship between the level of procrastination and work productivity of the academic staff. Based on the aforementioned results, the researcher provided some implications for the institution to consider.

show abstract

“…Therefore, to complete their daily tasks, it may take longer to work (so that the concentration level becomes lower and more fatigued) or may even rush to carry out their duties (so that it might lead to errors). As a result, it creates procrastination behavior, which results in lower performance results (Metin, U.B., et al, 2018). The organization must also provide counseling for employees to learn stress management techniques to overcome stress problems so that high performance can be achieved (Ali, W.U., et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antecedent and impact of procrastination on public sector

Darmi

Ingsih

2019

HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to create a model of the procrastination on Public Works Office of Semarang City, Central Java. The increasing need for excellent service in the field of building and city planning, is increasingly increasing the workload for employees. The large number of community complaints about old problems and the difficulty of licensing and information and developer problems are important factors in performance appraisal. Factors that cause the length of processing of permits include lack of professionalism of civil servants in carrying out tasks and tend to like to postpone work. Based on the complaint, it is necessary to analyze what causes procrastination and how it impacts the agency. The population in this study were civil servants, with a sample of 111 people. Data obtained by survey method using a questionnaire. The analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis. The study found that workload and educational level had an impact on procrastination. Procrastination affects stress and employee performance. Workload is the strongest influence affecting procrastination, which has a direct impact on employee performance. While stress does not mediate the relationship of procrastination on employee performance.

show abstract

Correlates of procrastination and performance at work: The role of having “good fit”

Cited by 62 publications

References 44 publications

Examining the impact of psychological capital on academic achievement and work performance: The roles of procrastination and conscientiousness

Examining the impact of psychological capital on academic achievement and work performance: The roles of procrastination and conscientiousness

Procrastination and Work Productivity of Academic Staff: Implications to the Institution

Antecedent and impact of procrastination on public sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About