2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-6279(11)60083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation assessment and monitoring of the potential pollutants in the surface sediments of Pyeongchang River, Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The constant 1.5 is the background matrix correction factor due to lithogenics. The classification of geo-accumulation index [53] indicates: class 0 (Igeo≤0) unpolluted, class 1 (0<Igeo<1) uncontaminated to moderately contaminated, class 2 (1<Igeo<2) moderately contaminated, class 3 (2<Igeo<3) moderately to strongly polluted, class 4 (3<Igeo<4) strongly polluted, class 5 (4<Igeo<5) strongly to extremely polluted, and class 6 (5>Igeo) extremely polluted. Very strong contamination Table 3.…”
Section: Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant 1.5 is the background matrix correction factor due to lithogenics. The classification of geo-accumulation index [53] indicates: class 0 (Igeo≤0) unpolluted, class 1 (0<Igeo<1) uncontaminated to moderately contaminated, class 2 (1<Igeo<2) moderately contaminated, class 3 (2<Igeo<3) moderately to strongly polluted, class 4 (3<Igeo<4) strongly polluted, class 5 (4<Igeo<5) strongly to extremely polluted, and class 6 (5>Igeo) extremely polluted. Very strong contamination Table 3.…”
Section: Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its advantage is that it offers the possibility of assessing sediment contamination in various sedimentary environments. In the case of aquatic ecosystems, this index is commonly used for marine (Özkan 2012;Attia and Ghrefat 2013;Ong et al 2013), fluvial (Bojakowska and Sokołowska 1998;Ghrefat and Yusuf 2006;Nikolaidis et al 2010;Kabir et al 2011;Rabee et al 2011;Rubin et al 2011;Varol and Sen 2012;Yahaya et al 2012;Kalender and Uçar 2013), lake (Zeng and Wu 2009;Choiński et al 2010;Bing et al 2011;Hu et al 2011;Cáceres Choque et al 2013;Alikaj et al 2014; El- Sayed et al 2015;Gao et al 2015;Guo et al 2015) and reservoir sediments (Loska and Wiechuła 2003;Saleem et al 2012;Young et al 2012;Bąk et al 2013;Goher et al 2014;Tang et al 2014;Wang et al 2014;Palma et al 2015) as well as in marshes and peats (Bai et al 2012) in various climatic zones. Modern applications of the I geo are also varied; even for the algorithm for calculating, it takes different forms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P index 는 위에서 나타낸 세 가지 지수(PLI, ERI, I geo )를 이용하여 지역별 또는 정점별 우선순위를 매겨 저서생태계 위해도를 평가하 는 방법으로 다음과 같이 계산한다 (Kabir et al, 2011). o C for 1 h, then remove the cover and reduced the volume to less then 3 mL by further heating -another 5 mL 8.8 M H 2 O 2 , one more time as described above -25 mL 1.0 M NH 4 OA C , pH 2, shaking at 22±5 o C for 16 h 4* Residual Metals bound in lithogenic mineral -HNO 3 :HF:HClO 4 :HCl=6:4:1:2 *Although not part of extraction procedure, the addition of residual step is useful for quality control, since sum of step 1-4 can be compared with results of a separate total acid digestion.…”
Section: 미량금속의 오염도 및 위해도 평가mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…선철인 · 이영주 · 안정현 · 이용우 factor (EF), geo-accumulation index (I geo ), metal pollution index (MPI), pollution load index (PLI), ecological risk index (ERI), priority index (P index ), ERL/ERM 등이 있다 (Hakanson, 1980;Tomlinson et al, 1980;Muller, 1981;Long et al, 1998;Zhang and Liu, 2002;Kabir et al, 2011;Ghani et al, 2013). 그러나 퇴적물 내에서 미량금속은 화학적 존재형태(탄산염, 산화물, 수산화물, 황화물 및 유기물 등)에 따라 금속의 거동 및 생물이용성이 달라지기 때문에 미량금속의 총 농도만으로는 해양환경 및 생태계에 미치는 영향을 정확히 파악하 는데 어려움이 있다 (Yuan et al, 2004).…”
unclassified