2013
DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.195-197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between Bauman's and Carrying Angle in Children with Supracondylar Fracture of Humerus

Abstract: supracondylar fracture,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The population normal is 64°-81° and angles in excess of this suggests varus angulation of the distal humerus [47] with measurement errors of up to 7° to be anticipated [48]. This measurement, whilst not identical to the carrying angle is a reasonable surrogate and can be used to predict cubitus varus deformity [49,50].…”
Section: Radiographic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The population normal is 64°-81° and angles in excess of this suggests varus angulation of the distal humerus [47] with measurement errors of up to 7° to be anticipated [48]. This measurement, whilst not identical to the carrying angle is a reasonable surrogate and can be used to predict cubitus varus deformity [49,50].…”
Section: Radiographic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A third line was drawn along the lateral condylar physis. The angle between the first line and the third line was recorded as Baumann’s angle [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a review of the literature by Pretell-MazziniJ et al, Baumann's angle values were available in only few articles that expressed either as an absolute value or like a loss of angle [13]. Most authors determine the change in Baumann's angle as statistically insignificant [14][15][16][17]. Foead A et al, note that only satisfactory reduction based on carrying angle and Baumann's angle assessed in an operating room were accepted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%