2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between glucose fluctuations and carotid intima-media thickness in type 2 diabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong links with type two diabetes demonstrated similar plausibility. Associations between CIMT, and type two diabetes are well established [36]. However, we failed to demonstrate a link between the lipoprotein subfractions and CIMT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…The strong links with type two diabetes demonstrated similar plausibility. Associations between CIMT, and type two diabetes are well established [36]. However, we failed to demonstrate a link between the lipoprotein subfractions and CIMT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…However, recent studies have suggested that blood glucose variability is more deleterious than a constant high glucose as it accelerates diabetic macrovascular complications [17]. Xiao-min et al reported that parameters of glycemic variability calculated from CGM data, such as SD and MAGE, were increased as atherosclerosis progressed in patients with type 2 diabetes, and that increases in carotid intima-media thickness correlated significantly with MAGE [18]. Furthermore, accumulated data have indicated there is a significant relationship between glucose fluctuations and oxidative stress that may lead to the development of atherosclerosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [22] studied 36 patients with type 2 diabetes and demonstrated that carotid IMT was correlated with MAGE. However, the authors used ultrasound to detect both preclinical atherosclerosis and the plaque formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%