“…The first was the 9-h IC , which, according to the authors, was better than the inhibition calculated respectively after 3 and 6 h exposure, because it was more comparable to the ''dynamic IC .'' The authors reported that the IC determined after 9 h gave LOW-COST MICROBIOTEST WITH Spirostomum teres Lilius et al, 1994;@Khangarot and Ray, 1987;ABelabed et al, 1993;BKu¨hn et al, 1989;CGuilermino et al, 1996;DSauvant et al, 1995a;g Le Duˆet al, 1993;FSauvant et al, 1995b;GDive et al, 1989;HScha¨ffer et al, 1994;ILe Duˆ, 1992;JWiger, 1985;*48- some information about the state of the ¹. pyriformis population at a given time, like a ''photograph'', although the second parameter (dynamic IC ), which was calculated from the real doubling time of populations treated for 9 h, indicated better all the events that occurred at different times, like ''a movie''. For this reason, the authors considered that this last parameter was the best index for cytotoxicity evaluation of xenobiotics with ¹. pyriformis.…”