2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215111001241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation between speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions

Abstract: Tests for transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses provide unique and functionally independent information about the integrity and sensitivity of the auditory system. Therefore, combining both tests will provide a more sensitive clinical battery with which to identify the location of different disorders (e.g. language-based learning impairments and hearing impairments).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the intensity used for the speech stimulus presentation, many studies use the stimulus at ∼ 80 dB SPL, 1 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 42 43 44 45 47 48 49 50 51 52 which can be explained by the fact that a normal conversation usually ranges from 60 to 80 dB SPL. 24 In addition, the latency of the responses to BAEP speech increases as intensity decreases as similarly occurs with BAEP-click.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the intensity used for the speech stimulus presentation, many studies use the stimulus at ∼ 80 dB SPL, 1 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 42 43 44 45 47 48 49 50 51 52 which can be explained by the fact that a normal conversation usually ranges from 60 to 80 dB SPL. 24 In addition, the latency of the responses to BAEP speech increases as intensity decreases as similarly occurs with BAEP-click.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, additional studies have been initiated in numerous languages such as Arabic, Brazilian Portuguese, French, Greek, Hebrew, Indian, Japanese, and Persian [1,11,13,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a systematic review about the applicability of speech ABR [1], it was possible to see that in 14.3% of articles, stimulation was performed monaurally; however, between the left ear and right ear stimulation, there is scientific evidence that even if there is a proven right ear advantage in the processing of speech, the left ear can participate in this process, but with less intense electrophysiological responses [28,36,46]. Therefore, an analysis of responses from both ears could help in the diagnosis process as well as therapeutic monitoring.…”
Section: Stimulated Earmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations