2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation Between the Crohn's Disease Activity and Harvey–Bradshaw Indices in Assessing Crohn's Disease Severity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
237
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 346 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
237
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Current disease activity was determined based on standardized clinical indices obtained during the clinical interview, using the Harvey-Bradshaw for Crohn's disease (CD) and the Powell-Tuck for ulcerative colitis (UC) (31,32). Cut off levels of >5 were used to identify active IBD (33,34).…”
Section: Disease Type and Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current disease activity was determined based on standardized clinical indices obtained during the clinical interview, using the Harvey-Bradshaw for Crohn's disease (CD) and the Powell-Tuck for ulcerative colitis (UC) (31,32). Cut off levels of >5 were used to identify active IBD (33,34).…”
Section: Disease Type and Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PRECiSE 1 and 2, data for CDAI and the HarveyBradshaw Index (HBI) were collected, and the correlation between two indexes was established. 22 In PRECiSE 3, efficacy was assessed using the HBI.…”
Section: Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, lack of an appropriate reference investigation with a longitudinal track record thus necessitated the distinction between responders and non-responders on the basis of a clinically meaningful response, i.e. an HBI drop of 3 or more between the baseline and follow-up visits 27 . In planning future studies, an alternative strategy could be the use of a consensus panel (including other markers such as CRP and FC) to determine the response status of each individual patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9/13 patients who completed PET scanning both at baseline and a median [range] of 12 [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] weeks after initiation of anti-TNF treatment had favourable clinical responses 27 (median [range] responder ΔHBI = 5 [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]; non-responder ΔHBI = 1[-1-2]), (Table 1). …”
Section: Contrasting Fdg-pet Measures In Responders Versus Non-responmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation