2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2004.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of CT analysis and audiometry in Japanese otosclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rotteveel et al 12 obtained good interobserver agreement ( ϭ 0.77), but they did not discuss intraobserver agreement in their study. Our agreement measurements were based on 162 petrous bones, compared with 36 in the study by Rotteveel et al 12 Shin et al 8 and Kiyomizu et al 9 did not assess the reliability of their grading systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Rotteveel et al 12 obtained good interobserver agreement ( ϭ 0.77), but they did not discuss intraobserver agreement in their study. Our agreement measurements were based on 162 petrous bones, compared with 36 in the study by Rotteveel et al 12 Shin et al 8 and Kiyomizu et al 9 did not assess the reliability of their grading systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Grading systems of otosclerosis are also clinically relevant as many authors have shown that as the severity of cochlear otosclerosis increases, the severity of sensorineural hearing loss increases. 8,9 Cochlear otosclerosis presents with combined conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Specific portions of the cochlea are attuned to certain frequencies of sound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shin et al [15] showed that BC thresholds were poorer in patients with endosteal involvement compared with BC in patients with fenestral otosclerosis. Kiyomizu et al [16] stated that greater BC levels were associated with a greater extent of demineralization. Hueb et al [3] showed a positive correlation between the size of the lesions, the activity, and the degree of cochlear endosteal involvement when compared to BC thresholds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%