We investigated hand function in mildly involved Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients (N = 16; EDSS 1−5, 9-hole peg test 14−32 s) during static and dynamic manipulation tasks using an instrumented device. When compared with healthy controls (N = 16), the patients revealed impaired task performance regarding their ability to exert prescribed patterns of load force (L; force acting tangentially at the digits-object surface). Regarding the coordination of grip force (G; normal component) and L, the data only revealed elevated G/L ratio, although both the G and L coupling (maximum correlation coefficients and the time lags between them), and G modulation (gain and offset of G with respect to L) remained comparable in the two groups. Finally, most of the data suggested no MS-specific effects of switching from uni-to bimanual tasks, from available visual feedback to deprived feedback conditions. We conclude that the deterioration in the ability for precise control of external forces and overgripping could precede the decoupling of G and L and decreased G modulation in early phases of the disease. The results also suggest that the applied methodology could be sensitive enough to detect mild levels of impairment of hand function in MS and, possibly, other neurological diseases.Keywords hand function; grip; load; force coordination; coupling; task performanceThe main hand function is to grasp and manipulate objects and external supports. This function is essential for everyday life, and, consequently, an impaired hand function (e.g., associated with neurological diseases or injuries) could be an important obstacle to living an independent life. When an externally fixed (e.g., a handle providing external support) or a free-moving object (a cup of coffee, or a tool) is held with the opposing tips of the thumb and fingers, a load force (L) is applied tangentially to the surfaces in contact to move the object or exert a reaction force. The slippage of the object is countered by friction force originating from grip force (G) acting normally to the surface. A consistent finding throughout the literature has been that the changes in G and L appear to be highly coordinated. This coordination is based not only on an ability of the neural controlling mechanisms to assess the skin-object friction coefficient and, based on it, apply a relatively low safety margin [i.e., G slightly higher than necessary to prevent slippage; (Johansson & Westling, 1984)], but also to modulate G in parallel with L without any considerable time delays between them [i.e., using anticipatory mechanisms (Flanagan & Wing, 1995. The result appears to be a stable and relatively low grip-toload (G/L) ratio (Johansson, 1998), high coupling of G and L (as assessed by both high correlation coefficient and virtually no time lags between them [Blakemore, Goodbody, & Wolpert, 1998;Flanagan & Tresilian, 1994]), and a high level of modulation of G with respect to changes in L [i.e., high gain and low offset assessed through the slope and intercept, respectively, o...