Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder assessment form and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with shoulder arthritis

Minoughan, Chelsea E.; Schumaier, Adam P.; Fritch, John; Grawe, Brian M.

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.036

Cited by 36 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors found strong correlation between the PROMIS Global-10 and EQ-5D scores (0.72) and moderate correlation between the PROMIS Global-10 physical component and ASES scores (0.57). In another study, Minoughan et al found that the PROMIS physical function upper extremity CAT score had a strong correlation with the SST score (0.64) and a moderate correlation with the ASES score (0.57) 25 . Additionally, the PROMIS physical function upper extremity instrument was more efficiently delivered, with an average time to completion of 96.9 6 25.1 seconds, compared with 160.…”

Section: Shouldermentioning

confidence: 96%

Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Cheung

Moore²,

Flores³

et al. 2019

JBJS Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been shown to correlate well with legacy measures used in orthopaedic surgery outcome studies. » PROMIS domains, particularly when administered as a computer adaptive test, are more efficient to administer and often have improved test characteristics when compared with historical patientreported outcome measures. » As more researchers use PROMIS to track patient outcomes in orthopaedics, clinicians and researchers may consider using PROMIS in future research as it allows for easy comparison between studies.

show abstract

Section: Shouldermentioning

confidence: 96%

Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Cheung

Moore²,

Flores³

et al. 2019

JBJS Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3,4,7,9,16 –19,29 A number of different PROMIS CAT forms have been utilized for clinical and research applications in orthopaedics, including not only physical function but also pain interference (the impact of pain on the patient’s life) and depression. 1,2,6,15,23 –25…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Feasibility of PROMIS CAT Administration in the Ambulatory Sports Medicine Clinic With Respect to Cost and Patient Compliance: A Single-Surgeon Experience

Lizzio

Blanchett

Borowsky

et al. 2019

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Pay-for-performance reimbursement models are becoming increasingly popular, but the implementation of a routine patient-reported outcome (PRO) collection system places additional burden on both the patient and the provider. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was developed in an effort to make PRO collection more practical and efficient, but providers may be reluctant to embrace a transition to a PROMIS-based clinical outcome registry.Hypothesis:PROMIS can be successfully incorporated into daily clinical practice, with an overall patient compliance rate of 80%.Study Design:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:As part of routine practice, all patients presenting to a single surgeon’s sports medicine clinic for an appointment were asked to complete a series of PROMIS computerized adaptive tests (CATs), including PROMIS Physical Function, Physical Function–Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Depression subscales. Overall compliance was calculated by dividing the number of survey sets completed by the number of eligible clinic visits. Compliance rates were further assessed by patient age, type of clinic visit, and location of injury. Costs associated with this system of routine PRO collection were categorized as start-up or maintenance costs.Results:From August 7, 2017, to December 8, 2017, there were 581 patients (1109 clinic encounters) who met inclusion criteria for the study. Of the 1109 clinic encounters, there was an overall compliance rate of 91.3% (1013/1109 visits during which the patient completed the entire PROMIS survey set). Overall, the full survey set consisted of a mean 15.3 questions and took a mean of 2.6 minutes to complete. Patients who were aged ≥62 years had a significantly lower compliance rate (81.8%; P < .0001) than each of the younger patient quartiles. When analyzing patients by the most common locations of injury (elbow, shoulder, hip, knee), the compliance rate for completing PROMIS was significantly higher for the hip than for the shoulder (95.1% vs 88.9%, respectively; P = .02). The cost of establishing a PROMIS-based registry using our project design and workflow was estimated at $2045, whereas the monthly maintenance cost was $1000.Conclusion:The routine electronic collection of PROMIS scores in the ambulatory orthopaedic clinic resulted in a compliance rate of over 90%, although older patients were generally less compliant than younger patients. Our system of data collection is practical and efficient in a high-volume orthopaedic clinic and places minimal financial burden on the provider.

show abstract

“…Mean PROs were also typical of what would be expected in a population presenting with OA, reporting higher pain and worse PF compared to the general U.S. population. 24 When evaluating for differences in PROMs between categories of radiographic severity, we were unable to identify any significant differences. This includes measures looking both at clinical function (ASES, SST, SAS, PROMIS PF, and PROMIS UE) and pain (VAS, PROMIS PI).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Mean PROs were also typical of what would be expected in a population presenting with OA, reporting higher pain and worse PF compared to the general U.S. population. 24 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Severity of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Does Not Correlate With Patient-Reported Outcomes

Kohan

Hill

Lamplot

et al. 2020

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Patient pain and clinical function are important factors in decision-making for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). The correlation between radiographic severity of arthritis and demographic factors with modern patient-reported outcome measures has not yet been well defined. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 256 shoulders in 246 patients presenting with isolated GHOA. All patients obtained standard radiographs and completed the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Shoulder Activity Scale, Visual Analog Scale, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests at the time of presentation. Radiographs were graded according to the Samilson-Prieto classification. Mean pain and functional scores were compared between the radiographic grades of osteoarthritis (OA) and demographic factors. Results: There were 6 shoulders rated as grade 1 OA, 41 shoulders as grade 2, 149 shoulders as grade 3a, and 65 shoulders as grade 3b. There was excellent interobserver reliability in grade of OA (j ¼ 0.77). There were no significant differences in patient-reported pain or any validated measure of clinical function between radiographic grades of OA (P >.05). Males reported higher function and lower pain scores than females (P ¼.001-.066), although only the values for the SST and PROMIS physical function test were clinically relevant. Discussion: While gender correlated with pain and function, the clinical relevance is limited. Radiographic severity of GHOA does not correlate with patient-reported pain and function, and symptoms should remain the primary determinants of surgical decision-making. Further investigation is necessary to examine whether radiographic severity of OA influences improvement following operative intervention in this population.

show abstract

Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder assessment form and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with shoulder arthritis

Cited by 36 publications

References 19 publications

Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Feasibility of PROMIS CAT Administration in the Ambulatory Sports Medicine Clinic With Respect to Cost and Patient Compliance: A Single-Surgeon Experience

Severity of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Does Not Correlate With Patient-Reported Outcomes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About