2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Correlation of Scheimpflug densitometry changes with clinical outcomes after corneal crosslinking

Abstract: Although the greatest and most durable post-CXL densitometry change was in the anterior layer, the degree of increased densitometry haze in the mid-stromal layer was most associated with and possibly predictive of improvement in CDVA, maximum K, and HOAs. The persistence of corneal haze at 6 months, measured by increased densitometry, might be a prognostic marker for CXL effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that one year after CXL, densitometry values remained elevated in the anterior, center and total layers of 0–2 mm and of 2–6 mm rings, and in the center and total layer of 6–10 mm ring compared to the baseline. This pattern is very similar to those studies in which densitometry changes were detected by Scheimpflug imaging [ 12 15 ], and suggest that cellular modifications in the central cornea persist at least one year after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that one year after CXL, densitometry values remained elevated in the anterior, center and total layers of 0–2 mm and of 2–6 mm rings, and in the center and total layer of 6–10 mm ring compared to the baseline. This pattern is very similar to those studies in which densitometry changes were detected by Scheimpflug imaging [ 12 15 ], and suggest that cellular modifications in the central cornea persist at least one year after treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In the literature there are contradictory data on which corneal region is mostly affected by CXL. Most of the studies describe that the highest densitometry change can be measured in the anterior layer [ 12 , 13 ], while the main involvement of the center layer has also been reported [ 15 ]. It might be because the thickness of center corneal layer is not defined in exact µm in Cornea Densito software of Pentacam HR, and differs in every individual.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, according to our ndigs, nal visual and refractive ourcomes can be achieved until the end of the rst postoperative year. In some recent studies, authors found deterioration in a few percent of involved eyes [29,31]. Similarly, 2.9% of treated eyes had more than two-line-loss 6 years after CXL in our series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…27 The biomechanical implication of the DL depth can be explained by considering that ectasia originates in almost all cases from the posterior float of the cornea. 86 The well-known structure of the human corneal stromal has been revealed by many studies based on X ray diffraction [87][88][89][90][91] . The anisotropy, the orientation, the intersection and the distribution of corneal lamellar structure and collagen fibrils interweaves are not uniform across the thickness of the stroma, but the reinforcing structure characterizes a stronger cornea in the anterior third (160-180µm) and a progressively weaker stroma in the posterior part (over 160-180).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%