Corrigendum to “Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology” [J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43 (2015) 2189–2194]

Shen, Pei; Zhao, Jingyang; Liu, Fan; Qiu, Hanxuan; Xu, Weifeng; Wang, Yanhui; Zhang, Sam

doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.004

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the advances in implant surface treatment, clinicians hardly suffer from failures after implant surgery [ 1 ], and now they seek to improve accuracy of the procedure. Placing the implants exactly where they were virtually planned provides a lot of clinical benefits [ 2 , 3 ]. Clinicians can avoid the anatomical structures which should not be invaded, i.e., the mandibular canal or the mental foramen, and it becomes possible to deliver the prefabricated prosthesis according to the virtually placed implant position immediately after the surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement by a Novel In-House Model-Free and Zero-Setup Fully Guided Surgical Template Made of a Light-Cured Composite Resin (VARO Guide®): A Comparative In Vitro Study

Song

Kim

et al. 2021

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This in vitro study mainly aimed to compare VARO Guide® to the surgical guide fabricated by CAD/CAM (NAVI Guide®) in terms of accuracy and efficacy of the implant surgery held in the dentiform model. Methods: Twenty surgeons, 10 dentists in the beginner group and 10 dentists in the expert group, participated in the study. Each surgeon conducted fully guided surgery in dentiform models twice, once with VARO Guide® (VG surgery) and the other time with a conventional type of templates, NAVI Guide® (NG surgery). Based on the superimposition of presurgical and postsurgical STL files, the positional deviations between the virtually planned and actually placed implants and the time spent on presurgical preparation and surgical procedures were estimated and compared. Results: All dimensional deviations were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), and there was no significant difference between the expert and beginner groups regardless of the guide system. The total procedure time (mean (median)) of the VG surgery (26.33 (28.58) min) was significantly shorter than that of the NG surgery (378.83 (379.35) min; p < 0.05). While the time spent only for the fully guided implant surgery (from the start of the surgical guide sitting onto the dentiform model to the final installation of the implant fixture) was comparable (p > 0.05), the presurgical preparation time spent on virtual implant planning and surgical guide fabrication in the VG surgery (19.63 (20.93) min) was significantly shorter compared to the NG surgery (372.93 (372.95) min; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Regardless of experience, both VG and NG surgery showed reliable positional accuracy; however, the total procedure time and the preparation time were much shorter in the VG surgery compared to the NG surgery.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement by a Novel In-House Model-Free and Zero-Setup Fully Guided Surgical Template Made of a Light-Cured Composite Resin (VARO Guide®): A Comparative In Vitro Study

Song

Kim

et al. 2021

Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Guided templates help in complex cases, such as alveolar bone defects, low and thin alveolar ridges, and multiple implant sites of complete edentulous jaws in patients who are eager to obtain a pair of prosthetic dentures for restoration of the chewing function. 3 The complex anatomical structure of the posterior jaw area near the nerves or sinuses and the strict available bone structure of the anterior maxilla in long-term edentulous patients 4 increase the surgical difficulty and require a more precise implantation. The CAD surgical template has been advocated during dental implantation to assist in the accuracy of implants.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method

Chen

Lin³

et al. 2019

Implant Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: During implantation planning, dentists should be able to make an informed decision regarding whether to use an implant template to assist the surgery.Purpose: The aim of this metaanalysis was to assess the results of implantation with or without an implant template based on the accuracy, survival rate, and other considerations.Materials and Methods: In January 2018, a systematic review was undertaken for randomized controlled trials and retrospective and prospective cohort studies with relevance to implant accuracy and the survival rate between the implant template and free-hand method. The odds ratios (ORs) of the survival rate and the mean difference of accuracy deviation from the selected papers were estimated by meta-analysis.Results: Of the 362 screened articles, 6 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Comparison of the survival rate of implant surgery with or without an implant template revealed no significant result (OR ¼ 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-4.51). Significant differences in accuracy were observed in angular (mean difference ¼ −5.45 degrees, 95% CI −0.66 to −4.24 degrees) and apical deviation (mean difference ¼ −0.83 mm, 95% CI −1.12 to −0.54).Conclusions: With the technology of computer-aided surgical template, implant placement can be more accurate than free-hand operation. No significant difference is observed in the survival rate between template and freehand.

show abstract

Corrigendum to “Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology” [J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43 (2015) 2189–2194]

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement by a Novel In-House Model-Free and Zero-Setup Fully Guided Surgical Template Made of a Light-Cured Composite Resin (VARO Guide®): A Comparative In Vitro Study

Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement by a Novel In-House Model-Free and Zero-Setup Fully Guided Surgical Template Made of a Light-Cured Composite Resin (VARO Guide®): A Comparative In Vitro Study

Comparison Between a Computer-Aided Surgical Template and the Free-Hand Method

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About