2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2003.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Corrigendum to: “Solar cells with porphyrin sensitization” [Optical Materials 21 (2002) 221–224]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, the ruthenium-based solar cell is prepared and estimated to be 8.8%. Although the synthesized [TPA]Zn-Por-CN1 demonstrates relatively lower effi ciency than ruthenium-based sensitizer, its effi ciency is comparable or even better compared with the reported porphyrin derivatives[20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For comparison, the ruthenium-based solar cell is prepared and estimated to be 8.8%. Although the synthesized [TPA]Zn-Por-CN1 demonstrates relatively lower effi ciency than ruthenium-based sensitizer, its effi ciency is comparable or even better compared with the reported porphyrin derivatives[20,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Recently, our lab has reported the feasibility of a porphyrin-polyaniline solid state DSSC with a solar conversion efficiency of 0.8% [10]. This device uses an aniline gel designed for in-situ photoelectrochemical generation of polyaniline between the aminophenylporphyrin dye adsorbed on TiO 2 and a polyaniline-coated counter electrode [11]. The porphyrin dye contained three carboxyphenyl substituents to adsorb tightly to the TiO 2 surface, and one aminophenyl group that could chemically bond to the growing polyaniline ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%