Corticosteroids for sore throat: a clinical practice guideline

Aertgeerts, Bert; Agoritsas, Thomas; Siemieniuk, Reed; Burgers, Jako; Bekkering, Geertruida E; Merglen, Arnaud; Driel, Mieke van; Vermandere, Mieke; Bullens, Dominique; Okwen, Patrick; Niño, Ricardo; Bruel, Ann Van den; Lytvyn, Lyubov; Berg-Nelson, Carla; Chua, S.; Leahy, Jack L.; Raven, Jennifer F.; Weinberg, Michael; Sadeghirad, Behnam; Vandvik, Per Olav; Brignardello‐Petersen, Romina

doi:10.1136/bmj.j4090

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…16 In the light of this new potentially practice changing evidence, we updated the latest Cochrane review 12 dealing with the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids as an adjunct treatment for sore throat in addition to standard care compared with standard care alone. This systematic review informed the parallel guideline published in a multilayered electronic format on bmj.com 17 and MAGICapp (https://www.magicapp.org/goto/guideline/JjXYAL/ section/j79pvn).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Corticosteroids for treatment of sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Sadeghirad

Siemieniuk

Brignardello‐Petersen

et al. 2017

BMJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To estimate the benefits and harms of using corticosteroids as an adjunct treatment for sore throat. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), trial registries up to May 2017, reference lists of eligible trials, related reviews. Study selection Randomised controlled trials of the addition of corticosteroids to standard clinical care for patients aged 5 or older in emergency department and primary care settings with clinical signs of acute tonsillitis, pharyngitis, or the clinical syndrome of sore throat. Trials were included irrespective of language or publication status. Review methods Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence, independently and in duplicate. A parallel guideline committee (BMJ Rapid Recommendation) provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including the selection of outcomes important to patients. Random effects model was used for meta-analyses. Quality of evidence was assessed with the GRADE approach. Results 10 eligible trials enrolled 1426 individuals. Patients who received single low dose corticosteroids (the most common intervention was oral dexamethasone with a maximum dose of 10 mg) were twice as likely to experience pain relief after 24 hours (relative risk 2.2, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.3; risk difference 12.4%; moderate quality evidence) and 1.5 times more likely to have no pain at 48 hours (1.5, 1.3 to 1.8; risk difference 18.3%; high quality). The mean time to onset of pain relief in patients treated with corticosteroids was 4.8 hours earlier (95% confidence interval −1.9 to −7.8; moderate quality) and the mean time to complete resolution of pain was 11.1 hours earlier (−0.4 to −21.8; low quality) than in those treated with placebo. The absolute pain reduction at 24 hours (visual analogue scale 0-10) was greater in patients treated with corticosteroids (mean difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.7 to 1.9; moderate quality). Nine of the 10 trials sought information regarding adverse events. Six studies reported no adverse effects, and three studies reported few adverse events, which were mostly complications related to disease, with a similar incidence in both groups. Conclusion Single low dose corticosteroids can provide pain relief in patients with sore throat, with no increase in serious adverse effects. Included trials did not assess the potential risks of larger cumulative doses in patients with recurrent episodes of acute sore throat. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42017067808.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Corticosteroids for treatment of sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

Sadeghirad

Siemieniuk

Brignardello‐Petersen

et al. 2017

BMJ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The panel followed the BMJ Rapid Recommendations procedures for creating a trustworthy recommendation, including using the GRADE approach to critically appraise the evidence and to move from evidence to recommendations (appendix 2 on bmj.com). 17 31 32 33 The panel initially identified patient-important outcomes and subgroup hypotheses needed to inform the recommendation. When creating the recommendation, the panel considered the balance of benefits, harms, costs, burdens of the treatments, the quality of evidence for each outcome, typical patient values and preferences and their expected variations, as well as acceptability.…”

Section: Current Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%