2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-014-0313-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-based quality measures in subgroup discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, Atzmueller et al describes a combination of quality measures for rules concerning the validity, that is, the accuracy and the simplicity of the contained patterns. Furthermore, cost‐based quality functions, e.g., Ref and cost‐sensitive approaches allow the modeling of costs for the quality assessment.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Subgroup Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Atzmueller et al describes a combination of quality measures for rules concerning the validity, that is, the accuracy and the simplicity of the contained patterns. Furthermore, cost‐based quality functions, e.g., Ref and cost‐sensitive approaches allow the modeling of costs for the quality assessment.…”
Section: Fundamentals Of Subgroup Discoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are number of quality measures used in subgroup discovery (Herrera, Carmona, Gonzalez, & Jose del Jesus, 2011) to quantify the statistical novelty of a subgroup or rule (Konijn, Duivesteijn, Meeng & Knobbe, 2014). Duivesteijn and Arno (2011) note that selecting the right quality measure is often a difficult task; this choice is either driven by familiarity with the measures or based on default choice.…”
Section: Associated Symptoms Include Nausea Mild Epigastric Tendernementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small number of studies tried to tackle fraud detection by adopting supervised techniques [9][10][11][12], which despite their undeniable potential and predictive power, exhibit the risk of focusing on old patterns and losing predictive capability as new records are evaluated over time [13]. Due to these considerations, most of the available literature in the field focuses on unsupervised techniques [3,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], with the limitation of spotting providers with very high claiming episodes, which distinguish themselves as evident outliers [23]. However, types of fraud are growing increasingly sophisticated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%