2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.820750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Population Screening Programs for Cardiovascular Diseases and Diabetes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Almost all low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have instated a program to control and manage non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Population screening is an integral component of this strategy and requires a substantial chunk of investment. Therefore, testing the screening program for economic along with clinical effectiveness is essential. There is significant proof of the benefits of incorporating economic evidence in health decision-making globally, although evidence from LMICs in NCD prevention is scanty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(194 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the cost-effectiveness of performing 1 h afterload glucose in obese subjects as a screening strategy to identify prediabetes, the data are heterogeneous as the success of a screening program depends on the context (epidemiology, social factors, political priorities, and budget constraints). A recent literature review shows that more cost-effective evaluations of national and regional prevention programs for non-communicable diseases are needed to guide policymakers [43]. We believe that good clinical practice would be to implement screening for young people at risk for prediabetes and lifestyle modification through improved nutrition and exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the cost-effectiveness of performing 1 h afterload glucose in obese subjects as a screening strategy to identify prediabetes, the data are heterogeneous as the success of a screening program depends on the context (epidemiology, social factors, political priorities, and budget constraints). A recent literature review shows that more cost-effective evaluations of national and regional prevention programs for non-communicable diseases are needed to guide policymakers [43]. We believe that good clinical practice would be to implement screening for young people at risk for prediabetes and lifestyle modification through improved nutrition and exercise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%