2023
DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Adjuvant Radiotherapy Be Avoided for Postmenopausal Patients With Node-Positive Estrogen Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer and Favorable Recurrence Score and SET2,3 Scores?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to continued interest in using molecularly stratified tests, such as signatures predictive of systemic chemotherapy or endocrine therapy benefit, to identify women for whom RT may not be necessary. Even in the cohort of patients from SWOG 8814, as suggested by Wang and Cai, 4 OncotypeDx has been previously evaluated in a subset of patients with node-positive breast cancer and the recurrence score was found to be associated with locoregional recurrence risk in certain subsets of the study, but not others. 9 As SWOG 8814 included women with node-positive breast cancer who were managed surgically with either mastectomy or BCS with heterogeneous use of RT, we do not feel this is the best choice to evaluate the value of SET 2,3 in answering RT benefit questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to continued interest in using molecularly stratified tests, such as signatures predictive of systemic chemotherapy or endocrine therapy benefit, to identify women for whom RT may not be necessary. Even in the cohort of patients from SWOG 8814, as suggested by Wang and Cai, 4 OncotypeDx has been previously evaluated in a subset of patients with node-positive breast cancer and the recurrence score was found to be associated with locoregional recurrence risk in certain subsets of the study, but not others. 9 As SWOG 8814 included women with node-positive breast cancer who were managed surgically with either mastectomy or BCS with heterogeneous use of RT, we do not feel this is the best choice to evaluate the value of SET 2,3 in answering RT benefit questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%