2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-015-0102-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Crop Height Affect the Wind Resource at Agriculturally Productive Wind Farm Sites?

Abstract: The collocation of cropland and wind turbines in the US Midwest region introduces complex meteorological interactions that could influence both agriculture and wind-power production. Crop management practices may affect the wind resource through alterations of land-surface properties. We use the weather research and forecasting (WRF) model to estimate the impact of crop height variations on the wind resource in the presence of a large turbine array. A hypothetical wind farm consisting of 121 1.8-MW turbines is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter approach, turbulence can be explicitly added by the parameterization [e.g., Fitch et al, 2012], or implicitly generated through the creation of shear within the rotor layer [e.g., Jacobson and Archer, 2012]. These wind-farm models have been used to simulate wake impacts on local hydrometeorology [Baidya Roy, 2011;Fitch et al, 2013a], investigate the aggregate effect of wind power on regional and global climate [Kirk-Davidoff and Keith, 2008;Fiedler and Bukovsky, 2011;Wang and Prinn, 2011;Vautard et al, 2014;Fitch, 2015a], evaluate the sensitivity of wind-farm output to surface characteristics [Vanderwende and Lundquist, 2015], and estimate global wind resources [Lu et al, 2009;Marvel et al, 2013;Jacobson and Archer, 2012;Adams and Keith, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter approach, turbulence can be explicitly added by the parameterization [e.g., Fitch et al, 2012], or implicitly generated through the creation of shear within the rotor layer [e.g., Jacobson and Archer, 2012]. These wind-farm models have been used to simulate wake impacts on local hydrometeorology [Baidya Roy, 2011;Fitch et al, 2013a], investigate the aggregate effect of wind power on regional and global climate [Kirk-Davidoff and Keith, 2008;Fiedler and Bukovsky, 2011;Wang and Prinn, 2011;Vautard et al, 2014;Fitch, 2015a], evaluate the sensitivity of wind-farm output to surface characteristics [Vanderwende and Lundquist, 2015], and estimate global wind resources [Lu et al, 2009;Marvel et al, 2013;Jacobson and Archer, 2012;Adams and Keith, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the wind speed profile is sensitive to other factors including the surface drag induced by canopy roughness. For example, in [16] the authors found that differences in the roughness length, z0, from changing the landscape from a corn canopy (zo = 0.25 m) to soybean (zo = 0.10 m) in the Noah LSM, increased hub-height wind speed and decreased wind shear in the U.S. Midwest. As changes in surface roughness affect surface drag, they also saw larger effects on wind shear in the bottom half of the rotor-disk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have examined the role of surface and subsurface properties on near-surface meteorology and PBL development (e.g., [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]), the role of the PBL scheme in WRF for wind forecasting (e.g., [14,15]), and the impact of crop type and surface drag (via the aerodynamic roughness length, zo) on hub-height wind speed and shear [16]. However, few studies have specifically looked at the role of surface energy exchange and LSM choice on rotor-disk wind shear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) meso and microscale model has been used extensively during the last few years in the wind energy field for a variety of applications [8][9][10]. It includes a wind turbine parameterization [11] enabling the study of the wake effect from wind turbines [5,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%