2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbp.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Could Disulfiram be a New Treatment for Crack Cocaine Dependence? A Pilot Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, 1580 records were identified, and 831 records were screened; of those, 305 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 157 studies (18.9%) with 402 treatment groups and 15 842 participants were included in the meta-analysis . The PRISMA diagram shows detailed information on the number of ineligible studies and the reasons for exclusion (Figure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In total, 1580 records were identified, and 831 records were screened; of those, 305 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 157 studies (18.9%) with 402 treatment groups and 15 842 participants were included in the meta-analysis . The PRISMA diagram shows detailed information on the number of ineligible studies and the reasons for exclusion (Figure).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Baldacara et al assessed the effectiveness of disulfiram as an add-on therapy to motivational interviewing and group therapy for patients with crack cocaine dependence [ 74 ]. The double-blind pilot study compared treatment with 250 mg of disulfiram daily vs. placebo for 60 days [ 74 ]. At the end of the study, 87% of subjects in the disulfiram group were drug-free compared to 47% in the control group ( p = 0.020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the study, 87% of subjects in the disulfiram group were drug-free compared to 47% in the control group ( p = 0.020). Disulfiram reduced the crack cocaine use dose and frequency by more than 50% [ 74 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%