Counterfeit formulations: analytical perspective on anorectics

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines the scope of anorectics in counterfeit weight-reducing formulations and provides insight into the present state of research in determining such adulterants. Analytical techniques utilised in profiling adulterants found in slimming products, including limitations and mitigation steps of these conventional methods are also discussed. The current legal status of the anorectics and analogues routinely encountered in non-prescription slimming formulations is also explored. Methods All reviewed literature was extracted from Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases using relevant search terms, such as, ‘counterfeit drugs’, ‘weight loss drugs’, ‘weight-reducing drugs’, ‘slimming drugs’, ‘anorectic agents’, and ‘counterfeit anorexics’. Legislation related to anorectics was obtained from the portals of various government and international agencies. Results Anorectics frequently profiled in counterfeit slimming formulations are mostly amphetamine derivatives or its analogues. Five routinely reported pharmacological classes of adulterants, namely anxiolytics, diuretics, antidepressants, laxatives, and stimulants, are mainly utilised as coadjuvants in fake weigh-reducing formulations to increase bioavailability or to minimise anticipated side effects. Liquid and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detectors are predominantly used techniques for anorectic analysis due to the possibility of obtaining detailed information of adulterants. However, interference from the complex sample matrices of these fake products limits the accuracy of these methods and requires robust sample preparation methods for enhanced sensitivity and selectivity. The most common anorectics found in counterfeit slimming medicines are either completely banned or available by prescription only, in many countries. Conclusions Slimming formulations doped with anorectic cocktails to boost their weight-reducing efficacy are not uncommon. Liquid chromatography combined with mass spectrometry remains the gold standard for counterfeit drug analysis, and requires improved preconcentration methods for rapid and quantitative identification of specific chemical constituents. Extensive method development and validation, targeted at refining existing techniques while developing new ones, is expected to improve the analytical profiling of counterfeit anorectics significantly.

Increasing Public Knowledge about Vitamin and Health Supplements during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…These compounds can cause appetite loss, reduce intestine fat absorption, and increase satiety. In addition, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory compounds are also often found in health supplement products (Bonsu et al, 2021).…”

Metal–DNA interactions: Exploring the impact of metal ions on key stages of forensic DNA analysis

“…The impact of the sample matrix is critical to the success of the analytical process [55]. As such evaluating inhibitor interactions with the matrix in the analysis of forensically relevant biological samples provides insight into method limitations, troubleshooting strategies and/or novel approaches to detect and mitigate contaminants co‐purified with the samples.…”

Utilizing experimental design and desirability function in optimizing RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of some skeletal muscle relaxants and analgesics

“…Patients are not the only ones impacted by counterfeit and substandard pharmaceuticals; the entire health care system, medical professionals, the drug companies, drug authorities, Ministries of Health, and national economies are also affected. Common target drugs for counterfeiting include high-demand, pricey medications, e.g., chemotherapeutic agents, antivirals, antibiotics, erectile dysfunction medications, analgesics, antihistamines, weight loss aids, hormones, steroids, and antianxiety medications 4 .…”