2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-859794/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Counting the Dead: 17 Million Vertebrates Directly Killed by the 2020’s Wildfires in the Pantanal Wetland, Brazil

Abstract: Anthropogenic factors have significantly influenced the frequency, duration, and intensity of meteorological drought in many regions of the globe, and the increased frequency of wildfires is among the most visible consequences of human-induced climate change. Despite its role in determining biodiversity outcomes in different ecosystems, wildfires can cause negative impacts on wildlife. We conducted ground surveys along line transects to estimate the first-order impact of the 2020 wildfires on vertebrates in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…That such low proportions of animals were killed in the fires considered in the studies we compiled does not necessarily mean that some fires, especially fires of high severity and large extent, do not kill many animals. Indeed, a recent study based on systematic counts of burnt corpses indicates that millions of vertebrate animals were killed in a ~40,000 km 2 area exposed to fires in the Pantanal, South America (Tomas et al, 2021). and prohibitively expensive transmitters.…”
Section: Direct Effects Of Fire On Animal Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That such low proportions of animals were killed in the fires considered in the studies we compiled does not necessarily mean that some fires, especially fires of high severity and large extent, do not kill many animals. Indeed, a recent study based on systematic counts of burnt corpses indicates that millions of vertebrate animals were killed in a ~40,000 km 2 area exposed to fires in the Pantanal, South America (Tomas et al, 2021). and prohibitively expensive transmitters.…”
Section: Direct Effects Of Fire On Animal Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vs. animals that emigrated outward from the firegrounds immediately prior to or following the fire's passage). Likewise, some recent studies have documented the-sometimes very high-numbers of animals killed in fires (Tomas et al, 2021), but we do not directly consider such studies because they lack a before-after component, so cannot provide evidence of proportional population losses, or survival rates of individual animals, in fire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding the data of wildfire occurrence in 2020 (Tomas et al, 2021;ICV, 2020), the burned areas in the Pantanal of the municipality of Poconé make up 22% of the total area affected by fire in the whole biome and 40% of what was burned in the portion of the Pantanal that lies in the state of Mato Grosso. This extension of the wildfires in Poconé highlights the dimension of the impacts of fires on the whole biome, regardless of the macrohabitat characteristics, which explains the high mortality of fauna estimated by Tomas et al (2021). Most of these animals did not have the opportunity to escape from their original macrohabitats or reach or move to other habitats, causing this collapse in the Pantanal's biodiversity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2020, the whole state was strongly affected by fires. In the whole Pantanal biome, a total of 3.9 million hectares were burned (Tomas et al, 2021), which represents almost 30% of its total area. According to ICV (2020), in Mato Grosso, proportionally, the Pantanal was the most impacted biome and, among all municipalities of Mato Grosso, Poconé was the most affected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation