“…Future work would continue to benefit from rigorously evaluating and teasing apart the impact of various interventions on not just the overall magnitude of hospitalizations and deaths, but on the differential impact across subgroups [ 12 ] and contexts: answering questions about who benefited from various strategies and interventions and how and why they worked (ie, the pathways by which direct and indirect benefits accrued). It has been well-established in Canada and across countries [ 9 , 10 , 13 ] that differential exposure risks to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and subsequent mortality, were amplified at the intersections of household crowding and size [ 11 , 14 ], workplace exposures [ 15 , 16 ], and systemic barriers to prevention and care (including access to therapeutics; see [ 17–19 ]). Our findings should not be interpreted as though the public health measures, strategies, and interventions did not work, as evidence points to large, overall prevention in COVID-19 deaths [ 20 ].…”