2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cox maze III procedure: The best alternative in surgery for atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 In general, the cut-and-sew Maze III procedure (CSM) is considered the gold standard for surgical management of AF because of the ensured transmurality, especially for those cases involving mitral valve disease and a thick left atrial wall. [9][10][11][12] Unfortunately, CSM is still viewed as a complex and high-risk procedure, and most surgeons are reluctant to perform it during cardiac operations. A possible source of this reluctance may be related to the limited available evidence, with the majority of studies related to the impact of the CSM on operative risk observational studies instead of prospective randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: See Editorial Commentary Page 618mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 In general, the cut-and-sew Maze III procedure (CSM) is considered the gold standard for surgical management of AF because of the ensured transmurality, especially for those cases involving mitral valve disease and a thick left atrial wall. [9][10][11][12] Unfortunately, CSM is still viewed as a complex and high-risk procedure, and most surgeons are reluctant to perform it during cardiac operations. A possible source of this reluctance may be related to the limited available evidence, with the majority of studies related to the impact of the CSM on operative risk observational studies instead of prospective randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: See Editorial Commentary Page 618mentioning
confidence: 99%