2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.12.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coxiella burnetii associated placental lesions and infection level in parturient cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
61
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
8
61
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…FISH has been used in veterinary reports to detect C. burnetii in ruminant placentas using both IS1111 and 16S rRNA probes (40,41). Its use to detect C. burnetii in human lymph nodes has only recently been published (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FISH has been used in veterinary reports to detect C. burnetii in ruminant placentas using both IS1111 and 16S rRNA probes (40,41). Its use to detect C. burnetii in human lymph nodes has only recently been published (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection of bacterial shedders is important to investigate the spread of C. burnetii among animals and from animals to humans and to assess the potential zoonotic risk. Coxiella burnetii is shed mainly in birth products such as fluids and placenta, but may also be excreted in feces, urine, vaginal mucus, and milk (Rodolakis, 2009;Hansen et al, 2011). In cattle, milk has been shown to be a significant route of shedding (Guatteo et al, 2007a) and indications exist that C. burnetii may induce inflammation of the mammary gland in cattle (Barlow et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of infection was 35%, which falls within the range reported in the international literature ( The sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA assay used in the present study are unknown and, hence, the true prevalence of the disease may be different from what is reported herein. Nonetheless, most research groups utilize either ELISA or complement fixation test for bulk milk antibody detection, which appear to be similar in terms of sensitivity and specificity (Hansen et al 2011, Schalch et al 1998). Seropositive animals were found in herds that were characterized as negative on the basis of antibody presence in the bulk milk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%