Craft metrics to value co-production

Durose, Catherine; Richardson, Liz; Perry, Beth

doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06860-w

Cited by 40 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although one might criticise and rebel against an academic knowledge production in which excellence is only indicated by self-referential academic standards and bibliometrics (cf. Durose et al 2018), it is a current mainstream setting, an institutional framework we need to work with at the moment striving to cultivate ecosystems that may move us into hopefully more productive and transformative collaborations.…”

Section: Conclusion: Surfing In the Archipelago Of Urban Research Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint programming for urban transformations: the making of the JPI Urban Europe Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda

Bylund¹

2020

Urban Transform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Joint Programming Initiative (JPI) Urban Europe, a transnational initiative by European countries in partnership with the European Union (EU) to tackle the challenge of sustainable urbanisation by programming urban research and innovation, launched its updated Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) in February 2019. Developed in the field of sustainable urbanisation, it is based on a wide set of sectors, disciplines, research frontiers, and their asymmetrical interconnections, as well as consultations among stakeholders in these areas, ranging from global policy and EU levels over national to regional and local actors including civil servants and politicians, researchers, commercial actors, civil society. Since the international landscape of urban policy and particularly urban transformations has recently been shifting with UN Agenda 2030, UN Habitat New Urban Agenda, and, in Europe, with an Urban Agenda for the EU, urban research and innovation, at least the parts tackling sustainable urbanisation, strives to elaborate how to support these objectives. Together with an account of how this was done from the insider perspective of a programme manager, this note presents questions and issues that will direct the JPI Urban Europe programming beyond 2020. The updated JPI Urban Europe agenda’s main novelty is a dilemma-driven approach to the thematic priorities in the programming activities and a transition arena concept for its implementation.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion: Surfing In the Archipelago Of Urban Research Anmentioning

confidence: 99%

Joint programming for urban transformations: the making of the JPI Urban Europe Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda

Bylund¹

2020

Urban Transform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Coupled with this is a growing concern that the terms coproduction and co-design are losing meaning and creating weaknesses in the standard science too because they are being overused without attendance to the values, principles, and practices that ought to underpin them [ 13 - 15 ]. Indeed, there is variability in how coproduction and co-design are defined, so determining the different effects, impacts, and outcomes of various approaches is a challenge that will require an agreed upon vocabulary [ 14 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

Palmer¹

2020

J Participat Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participation in health care is currently the zeitgeist/spirit of our times. A myriad of practices characterizes this “participatory Zeitgeist” in contemporary health care, which range from patients and professionals collaborating as partners in service delivery and treatment decision-making, to crowdsourced cures and participation in online communities, to using health apps, to involvement in health care quality improvement initiatives for systems redesign using coproduction and co-design methods. To date, patient engagement and participation in online communities and the use of apps have received a good deal of attention in participatory medicine. However, there has been a less critical examination of participation in health care planning, design, delivery, and improvement. In the face of what Thomas Kuhn called a scientific revolution, we are presented with the opportunity to re-examine some of the assumptions underpinning participation in health care and some of the emerging anomalies and weaknesses in the current science. This re-examination will allow the development of a new paradigm, a science of participation. In this science, we can systematically test, refine, and advance participation in health care to build a unifying language and theories from across the interdisciplinary fields of participatory design, medicine, and research to develop and test models to explain impacts and outcomes. A science of participation will allow the emergent and unexplained facts to be addressed in the current participatory mood of health care planning, design, delivery, and improvement.

show abstract

“…Through a process of co-production, partners create more 'relevant' research questions, implementable outputs and potentially wide-reaching and significant impacts. Durose et al (2018) argue that 'Opening up science beyond scientists is essential, particularly where problems are complex, solutions are uncertain and values are salient' -yet co-production is often under-valued and under-reported (p.32). By sharing different types of knowledge (i.e.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are increasing arguments for bridging diverse knowledges and co-producing new knowledge between researchers, professional communities and citizens to create health-promoting built environments. The new THRIVES Framework (Towards Healthy uRbanism: InclusiVe, Equitable, Sustainable) echoes the call that healthy urbanism processes should be participatory and this principle informed the development of the Framework itself, which involved several stages of informal and formal testing with stakeholders, through a process of action research and 'extended peer review'. Formal feedback about the design of the preliminary Framework and its implementation in built environment practice was gathered through a participatory workshop with 26 built environment and public health professionals in January 2020. Participants were encouraged to share their knowledge, ask questions, critique and provide recommendations. Overall, participants were supportive of the conceptual messages of the THRIVES Framework and more critical of the visual design of the preliminary version. They also questioned whether further resources would be required to implement the Framework. This research created a forum for stakeholders, who may typically be outside the research process, to shape the development of a conceptual framework for healthy urbanism. Further research and collaboration will create resources to bridge the gap between this new conceptualisation and practice.

show abstract

Craft metrics to value co-production

Cited by 40 publications

References 7 publications

Joint programming for urban transformations: the making of the JPI Urban Europe Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda

Joint programming for urban transformations: the making of the JPI Urban Europe Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda

The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation

Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About