2010
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2010.56659888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creating Value in Transnational Higher Education: The Role of Stakeholder Management.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stella states that national frameworks for quality assurance of cross-border education are not well developed [2], though Murray argues that for Australia a sophisticated framework for monitoring of cross-border higher education exists [26]. Bolton argues that existing quality assurance frameworks often do not allow accommodation of manageable risks associated with innovation, flexibility and experimentation in new market places, discussing a partnership between Australia and China [27]. Billing sees especially in Europe a ‘general’ model of quality assurance developing [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stella states that national frameworks for quality assurance of cross-border education are not well developed [2], though Murray argues that for Australia a sophisticated framework for monitoring of cross-border higher education exists [26]. Bolton argues that existing quality assurance frameworks often do not allow accommodation of manageable risks associated with innovation, flexibility and experimentation in new market places, discussing a partnership between Australia and China [27]. Billing sees especially in Europe a ‘general’ model of quality assurance developing [28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shanley argues for the use of a website in increasing transparency in a network of undergraduate education across Europe [37]. Additionally, Bolton in her article on a Chinese-Australian collaborative educational alliance argues that transparency towards stakeholders is important to create value of the degree [27]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the prospective approach focuses on eliminating problems before they occur by reflecting on the different student presage factors. In this context, the prospective approach can be considered as the best way to combine the fulfilment of the educational and service quality standards required by TNE exporting countries, with the desired contextualisation which is currently absent in TNE (Bolton and Nie 2010;Farrugia 2012).…”
Section: Educational Quality Management: Retrospective Vs Prospectivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different stakeholders such as students, parents, employers, and the government, and all of them have different perceptions on the performance of higher education (Arjomandi et al, 2009). The meaning of university extends beyond simply preparing the workforce for the business environment (Bolton & Nie, 2010). Developing and maintaining better performance in universities can result in the improvement of public and private sectors (Bloom et al, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%