2005 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2005.1651451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crest Factor Reduction in Multi-carrier WCDMA Transmitters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) is one of the earliest signals that experienced high PAPR [43]. Here, a 20MHZ bandwidth signal was generated and tested with PSI technique.…”
Section: Testing Psi Performance With Wcdma Dvb S2 4g and 5g Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wideband code division multiple access (WCDMA) is one of the earliest signals that experienced high PAPR [43]. Here, a 20MHZ bandwidth signal was generated and tested with PSI technique.…”
Section: Testing Psi Performance With Wcdma Dvb S2 4g and 5g Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, they are not adequate enough to generate signals which can meet the stringent requirements of modern communication standards. In the following subsections, pros and cons of these conventional CFR techniques are briefly discussed, highlighting their limiting factors [6,8,[10][11][12].…”
Section: Conventional Cfr Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crest Factor Reduction (CFR) techniques [8,9], in conjunction with Digital Predistortion (DPD) techniques are considered to be a promising solution to simultaneously achieve higher linearity and efficiency [10][11][12][13][14][15]. However, a complete experimental validation of both benefits and drawbacks induced by their application on a DPA is not yet reported in literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, they suffer from significant implementation difficulties or specific requirements for a certain standard; in other words, they are not for general purposes. Therefore, four of the methods were illustrated in [1] as peak windowing [37], noise shaping [38], peak cancellation (PC-CFR) [39]- [42], and constrained clipping [43]- [45] for ET purpose selection. Among them, although PC-CFR is one of the most popular solutions in practical engineering, it may suffer from serious peak EVM degradations, resulting in lower throughput when the clipping ratio is high.…”
Section: Digital Front-end Design For Envelope Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%