1992
DOI: 10.1093/bja/69.5.465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cricoid Pressure May Prevent Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway

Abstract: We have studied 42 female patients undergoing elective day-case surgery allocated randomly to two groups. After induction of anaesthesia an attempt was made to insert a laryngeal mask airway after application of cricoid pressure in one group or with no cricoid pressure in the other. The anaesthetist was unaware of the application, or not, of cricoid pressure. Successful insertion was achieved at the first or second attempt in 19 of the 22 patients in the non-cricoid pressure group, but in only three of the 20 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on ProSeal (5) and classic LMA (12,14,15,18) report similar findings. Li et al (5) observed the anatomic position Scores 1 and 2 in 17/50 (34%) patients with CP compared to 38/50 (76%) patients after the release of CP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies on ProSeal (5) and classic LMA (12,14,15,18) report similar findings. Li et al (5) observed the anatomic position Scores 1 and 2 in 17/50 (34%) patients with CP compared to 38/50 (76%) patients after the release of CP.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Previous studies confirm impairment of ventilation via the classic LMA, when CP was applied prior to device insertion (12,14,15). Application of CP may cause laryngeal obstruction due to cricoid cartilage deformation or tilting resulting in a vocal cord closure (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The LMA was subsequently inserted successfully in all the patients after removal of cricoid pressure. 22 These results are in direct conflict with those of previous studies 23' 24 that showed a failure rate of 3%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Successful LMA Classic ™ placement during cricoid pressure varies from a low of 15% 72,73 to a more encouraging 90%. 74 Overall, placement is more likely to be successful without cricoid pressure (92% vs. 66%).…”
Section: Third Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%