Crime risk evaluation within information sharing between the police and community partners

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide profiles for crimes which can be used to model the context for information sharing between the police and community partner organisations. This context can then be integrated with information-sharing syntax used by Single Point of Contact (SPoC) agents to process information sharing requests [1]. The questionnaires attempt to classify crimes into categories, with identify profiles of crime-types, according to the level of information sharing they necessitate between community partner organisations. Crimes are separated into classifications, which are based on the perceived level of necessary informationexchange among police and community partners. The aim of the questionnaire is to gather academic responses to identify the level of risk in order that it can be defined as risk assessment level, which is key to enhancing the public"s reassurance in the police.

A SWOT Analysis of Small Private Online Courses

“…They need to have a comprehensive understanding of the privacy laws and regulations applicable to their region or country. To comply with data privacy laws, SPOCs should have a robust data security and privacy policy in place (Uthmani et al, 2010). The policy should outline the measures taken to protect student data, such as encryption, secure transmission, and access controls.…”

Better information sharing, or “share or be damned”?

“…Police forces in England and Wales will often have cause, chiefly in working with other agencies such as the Disclosure and Barring Service, to share information with employers and with those bodies that exercise functions for an array of public protection purposes (Grace, 2013a). This will commonly be to safeguard the public, especially children, against the perpetration by (most commonly) convicted offenders of further violent and sexual offences in particular "risky" community settings (Uthmani et al, 2011). Employers are often concerned about the risk that individuals pose to their customers or service users, particularly in the health, education and social care settings.…”

“…This will commonly be to safeguard the public, especially children, against the perpetration by (most commonly) convicted offenders of further violent and sexual offences in particular 'risky' community settings (Uthmani et al, 2011). Employers often are concerned about the risk that individuals pose to their customers or service users, particularly in the health, education and social care settings.…”