1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf02766777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,005
0
74

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,888 publications
(1,086 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
1,005
0
74
Order By: Relevance
“…In this qualitative analysis paradigm, support includes not simply the number of times an idea is mentioned nor how many people mentioned it, but also how strongly it was emphasized and how important it seemed to the participants. Rigour in this method relies on credibility and dependability as evidenced by the trustworthiness of the analysis process and presentation of its results, rather than traditional measures of inter-rater reliability (Guba, 1981). The three phases of the data analysis process used in this study are described below; all phases were conducted collaboratively with extensive consultation between the two researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this qualitative analysis paradigm, support includes not simply the number of times an idea is mentioned nor how many people mentioned it, but also how strongly it was emphasized and how important it seemed to the participants. Rigour in this method relies on credibility and dependability as evidenced by the trustworthiness of the analysis process and presentation of its results, rather than traditional measures of inter-rater reliability (Guba, 1981). The three phases of the data analysis process used in this study are described below; all phases were conducted collaboratively with extensive consultation between the two researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we made the data available for review, as proposed to reinforce dependability (LODICO; SPAULDING; VOEGTLE, 2006). To ensure confirmability, we implemented a confirmability audit (GUBA 1981;LODICO;SPAULDING;VOEGTLE, 2006) by using an intercoder agreement procedure, which was performed only in the part of the results that refers to the model conceptions (fourth axis), since this was the most interpretative, therefore more susceptible to trustworthiness threats. To this end, the second author independently coded 20% of all papers included in our corpus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher used a manual coding process where color-coding, groupings, and data analysis were completed over a series of days. Following analysis, peer-checking and debriefing amongst the research team was completed to improve data trustworthiness and rigor, additionally, final survey results were also shared and discussed with the expert panel as an agenda item during a board meeting (Guba, 1981).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%