Critérios de vulnerabilidade social: Uma comparação entre o Índice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social e os critérios propostos pela aplicação do Value-Focused Thinking

Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme; Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua

doi:10.13059/racef.v8i2.296

RACEF

2017

DOI: 10.13059/racef.v8i2.296

|View full text |Cite

Critérios de vulnerabilidade social: Uma comparação entre o Índice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social e os critérios propostos pela aplicação do Value-Focused Thinking

Kaio Guilherme Cuoghi

Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After this first stage, the analyst classifies between fundamental, means and ends objectives by ordering from the specific objectives to the more general objectives. Then, the analyst translates the mean objectives into attributes, also named criteria(Cuoghi and Leoneti, 2017).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A decision-making method for consensus building applied to increase the chances of decision implementation in NPOs: the case of fundraising problem

Ziotti

Leoneti

2021

BJO&PM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Goal:The present research aimed to demonstrate the use of a decision-making method based on game theory to support the resolution of a usual NPO's management problem, which is the one of fundraising with different stakeholders' preferences.Design / Methodology / Approach: The application of the method occurred within a NPO in the city of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, and included: (i) a phase for structuring the problem in the form of a decision matrix; and (ii) a group decision phase for supporting the NPO's director board in their group decision-making process. Results:The method predicted reasonably well the group decision, whose effects were demonstrated with a greater sense of justice. Two years after the decision made, the authors verified through a new visit to the NPO that the mix of the choice of the group and the method was indeed implemented. Limitations of the investigation:It should be noted that, given the sample size, the results achieved in this study should be corroborated by other studies that eventually replicate the procedures proposed here. Practical implications:It has been concluded that the use of a formal approach can contribute to the solution of the fundraising problem in NPOs environment, increasing the chances for decision's implementation.Originality / Value: It is expected that the framework proposed can be used for other similar problems of group decision making in NPOs by the replication of the procedures presented in the paper.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A decision-making method for consensus building applied to increase the chances of decision implementation in NPOs: the case of fundraising problem

Ziotti

Leoneti

2021

BJO&PM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Critérios de vulnerabilidade social: Uma comparação entre o Índice Paulista de Vulnerabilidade Social e os critérios propostos pela aplicação do Value-Focused Thinking

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

A decision-making method for consensus building applied to increase the chances of decision implementation in NPOs: the case of fundraising problem

A decision-making method for consensus building applied to increase the chances of decision implementation in NPOs: the case of fundraising problem

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About