2021
DOI: 10.33399/biibfad.868418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CRITIC Temelli CODAS ve ROV Yöntemleri ile AB Ülkeleri Yaşam Kalitesi Analizi

Abstract: Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği (AB) üye ülkeleri yaşam kalitesi analizi çok kriterli karar verme (ÇKKV) tekniklerinden CRITIC, CODAS ve ROV yöntemlerinin kullanımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Ülkelere ait yaşam kalitesi değerlendirme sürecinde satın alma gücü indeksi, iklim indeksi, yaşam maliyeti indeksi, güvenlik indeksi, sağlık hizmeti indeksi, emlak fiyatları/gelir oranı, kirlilik indeksi ve trafikte harcanan süre indeksi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, multi-criteria decision-making method is applied since multiple criteria are used to determine the performance of global cities (Kaya et al, 2011;Çınaroğlu, 2021;Seyhan & Seyhan, 2021;Aydın, 2022). The reason why we chose this method in our study is that in recent days, the multi-criteria decision-making method is seen as one of the best tools for solving complex problems, and by using these techniques, the ability to decide between different alternatives is developed according to the given qualities/criteria for the best possible choice (Sama et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, multi-criteria decision-making method is applied since multiple criteria are used to determine the performance of global cities (Kaya et al, 2011;Çınaroğlu, 2021;Seyhan & Seyhan, 2021;Aydın, 2022). The reason why we chose this method in our study is that in recent days, the multi-criteria decision-making method is seen as one of the best tools for solving complex problems, and by using these techniques, the ability to decide between different alternatives is developed according to the given qualities/criteria for the best possible choice (Sama et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ROV method is a MCDM method performed in three simple steps ( [30]). The ranking of the alternatives is made by obtaining the best and worst utility values for each alternative ( [31], [32]). Three basic steps are applied in this technique ( [30], [33]).…”
Section: Range Of Value Technique (Rov)mentioning
confidence: 99%