Critical analysis of the application of the Safe Working Cycle (SWC)

Abstract

Purpose-This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of the Safe Working Cycle (SWC) in improving existing site safety performance of construction projects in Hong Kong, and to identify the perceived benefits, potential difficulties and insightful recommendations of implementing the SWC in the future. Design/methodology/approach-The professional views on the effectiveness of implementing the SWC, the benefits and difficulties of the SWC, together with the effective recommendations for future execution of the SWC, were gleaned by ten in-depth interviews involving the representatives of senior professional staff members from major construction companies and related government works departments. Findings-Responses from in-depth interviews indicated that the SWC is generally effective in improving site safety performance and preventing the occurrence of construction accidents. The implementation of the SWC is also found useful in facilitating safety-related communications, enhancing safety awareness of frontline workers and identifying potential hazards. However, the industrial practitioners encountered some difficulties associated with the SWC, including limited space on worksites, irregular working schedules for the different trades working on-site, a lack of motivation for participation by workers, and an over-tight project schedule that causes time pressure to complete work resulting in a lack of priority. Practical implications-The recommended measures include the establishment of a reward scheme, engagement of professional aerobic trainers, design of site-specific SWC, mandatory enforcement of the SWC through legislation, regular review of the SWC effectiveness, increased financial support from client organisations, and creation of a more realistic project schedule. Originality/value-This study has instigated a wider debate on the underlying benefits and potential difficulties of the SWC for reference by the construction industry at large. Although the SWC is being currently executed in those new-build construction projects only, it may likewise be applied to other projects within the wide spectrum of facilities management sector and large-scale building repair / maintenance services in both Hong Kong and overseas. Therefore, the contribution from this paper could be extended to the discipline of facilities management as well.

Determining and assessing the risks of commercial and recreational complex building projects in developing countries: a survey of experts in Iran

“…There is no explicit or firm rule on how to choose and how many experts to choose for the Delphi process. The number of the responders, indeed, depends on the factors of homogeneous and heterogeneous types of the sample, target of the Delphi, duration of data gathering, domain of the problem and acceptability of the answer (Chan et al , 2007, 2010; Chan and Choi, 2015). The number of participants is usually less than 50 and most of the time is around 15 to 20 (Sarvari et al , 2019b).…”

An Overview of Construction Occupational Accidents in Hong Kong: A Recent Trend and Future Perspectives

“…Research results revealed that there was a miraculous decline in construction accidents rate immediately after the adaptation of SMS in Hong Kong. However, the decreasing accident rate has slackened recently [25][26][27]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate accident types which cause more fatalities in the Hong Kong construction industry.…”

Case Study in a Working Environment Highlighting the Divergence between Sound Level and Workers’ Perception towards Noise

“…Specifically, these indifferent workers stated that the noise was not an issue and/or they were not bothered by it. With such a large proportion of exposed workers being aloof, this presents a significant barrier with respect to implementing hearing conservation efforts as disenchanted workers can negatively affect the success of occupational health and safety initiatives [ 22 , 23 ]. These results also support the assertion that workers do not fully comprehend the risk that they are exposed to [ 24 ] and that workers are becoming “normalized” to the excessive noise levels [ 25 ].…”