2001
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/34/13/101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical minima in elastic electron scattering from argon

Abstract: Relativistic ab initio calculations of both low-and high-angle critical minima in the differential cross sections are presented. The theoretical approach is based on the Dirac-Hartree-Fock method. Exchange between incident and target electrons is calculated exactly. Target polarization is described by ab initio potential taken from relativistic polarized orbital calculations. The position of our critical minima (39.3 eV, 68 •) and (39.5 eV, 141 •) agree well with recent measurements performed by Panajatović et… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar behavior is also noticed in figure 13(f), where the DCS is much lower at 38.21 eV than at E i =36.0 and 40.0 eV. Table 1 gives a comparison of our computed positions of the deepest minima in the DCS with those of six experimental [15,59,81,84,102,104] and eight other theoretical [15,22,32,34,88,101,103,105] predictions. It is evident from this table that the angular positions of the deepest DCS minima reported here produce an overall good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Positions Of Critical Minima In the Electron Dcssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar behavior is also noticed in figure 13(f), where the DCS is much lower at 38.21 eV than at E i =36.0 and 40.0 eV. Table 1 gives a comparison of our computed positions of the deepest minima in the DCS with those of six experimental [15,59,81,84,102,104] and eight other theoretical [15,22,32,34,88,101,103,105] predictions. It is evident from this table that the angular positions of the deepest DCS minima reported here produce an overall good agreement with the experimental data.…”
Section: Positions Of Critical Minima In the Electron Dcssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As the DCS values are usually reported with a step of 5°in the literature, one may infer that the angular position of any CM is not determined better than ±2.5°. The maximum deviation in angular position between our result and experiment is 141 143. taken from [22], and to the uncertainty in the theoretical values computed from the relativistic approximation of [34].…”
Section: Positions Of Critical Minima In the Electron Dcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Sienkiewicz et al (2001Sienkiewicz et al ( , 2003 have calculated the position of the critical minima for electron scattering using a fully relativistic potential scattering method including the static and polarization interactions. They also treat exchange with the incident electron exactly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saha (1991) based on the multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock method. Relativistic Dirac-Fock method, in connection with model polarization potentials was used by Sienkiewicz et al (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%