2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.106.214202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Critical properties of the Anderson transition on random graphs: Two-parameter scaling theory, Kosterlitz-Thouless type flow, and many-body localization

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the Anderson transition on random graphs by taking advantage of the knowledge on MBL. The numerous studies on the MBL transition, and in particular the difficulty of describing this phenomenon analytically starting from a microscopic model, have led to the development of an approach called the phenomenological renormalization group (RG) [46][47][48][49][50]. This approach is based on an avalanche mechanism thought to be responsible for an instability of MBL leading to a transition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
(511 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that here and further, we focus mostly on the localization, D 2 = 0, versus the delocalization, D 2 > 0, but not on the ergodicity, D 2 = 1, versus the non-ergodicity, 0 < D 2 < 1. Already in a fully disordered RRG at β = 1, the question of the existence of a non-ergodic phase in RRG has been a discussion point for years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][27][28][29][30][31][32], and even now the maximal system sizes of a few millions, N ∼ 10 6 , do not resolve this issue [14,31,32]. Therefore, in this work we calculate the fractal dimensions D 2 (and their generalization D q together with the singularity spectrum f (α) with the definitions given below) in the Appendix A only of finite sizes up to N ∼ 30000 and do not claim any ergodicity or non-ergodicity.…”
Section: Robustness Of Delocalization and Fractal Dimension Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that here and further, we focus mostly on the localization, D 2 = 0, versus the delocalization, D 2 > 0, but not on the ergodicity, D 2 = 1, versus the non-ergodicity, 0 < D 2 < 1. Already in a fully disordered RRG at β = 1, the question of the existence of a non-ergodic phase in RRG has been a discussion point for years [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][27][28][29][30][31][32], and even now the maximal system sizes of a few millions, N ∼ 10 6 , do not resolve this issue [14,31,32]. Therefore, in this work we calculate the fractal dimensions D 2 (and their generalization D q together with the singularity spectrum f (α) with the definitions given below) in the Appendix A only of finite sizes up to N ∼ 30000 and do not claim any ergodicity or non-ergodicity.…”
Section: Robustness Of Delocalization and Fractal Dimension Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paradigmatic example of the latter are spectral statistics, for which a connection between the 3D Anderson model below the transition (i.e., at W < W c ) and the predictions of the random matrix theory (RMT) were made already in the mid-eighties [69], shortly after the formulation of the quantum chaos conjecture [70,71]. The transition in finite systems then corresponds to a crossover between a quantum chaotic regime at W W c , in which spectral statistics follow predictions from the Gaussian orthogonal ensemble (GOE), and a localized regime at W W c , in which spectral statistics are Poissonian [66,[72][73][74][75][76].…”
Section: A Anderson Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%