2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Criticism on elasticity-sensitivity coefficient for assessing the robustness and sensitivity of ecosystem services values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a number of studies calculated the coefficient of sensitivity (CS) to validate the reliability of research results and the value coefficients (VCs) of ESV were adjusted by ±50% in most cases [22,33,47,64]. However, using the CS method to test the trustworthiness of evaluation results was criticized, because the value of CS is often less than 1 even when VCs were adjusted by ±25%, which indicates erroneously robust coefficients [74]. Hence, this study did not carry out CS analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of studies calculated the coefficient of sensitivity (CS) to validate the reliability of research results and the value coefficients (VCs) of ESV were adjusted by ±50% in most cases [22,33,47,64]. However, using the CS method to test the trustworthiness of evaluation results was criticized, because the value of CS is often less than 1 even when VCs were adjusted by ±25%, which indicates erroneously robust coefficients [74]. Hence, this study did not carry out CS analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of this study was that we did not employ the coefficient of sensitivity (CS) analysis method to account for the uncertainty of the represented biomes because this method has been criticized by its inability to address the reliability of the ESV estimation. This is because CS analysis is independent from the ±50% change in VC and it always gives values less than 1, which inaccurately indicates that the coefficients are robust [5,41]. Therefore, our study highlighted that further research is needed to establish another coefficient sensitivity analysis method that can account for the uncertainty of the model and the represented biome types.…”
Section: Changes In the Ecosystem Service Values And Land Use/cover Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The more prominent the corresponding change in the ESV with respect to a relative change in the coefficient value, the more serious is the utilization of a precise ecosystem value coefficient. However, in previous studies, the sensitivity analysis has been widely used [4,16,20,25,36,41,54,67,68].…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%