Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in Surgical Patients

Erden, Sevilay; Karadağ, Mevlüde; Demir, Sevil Güler; Atasayar, Semra; Yücel, Burcu Opak; Kalkan, Nevra; Erdoğan, Zühal; Ay, Ali

doi:10.5505/agri.2018.21548

Cited by 8 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The original APS-POQ-R (18) is an interviewer-administered PROM that was developed for postoperative and cancer-related pain and has been used or adapted to other forms of pain (19), translated into several languages (20-22) and demonstrates cross-cultural validity (23). In studies in the adult ED, the APS-POQ-R has been used as a PROM, either in part (4, 5, 24, 25) or in translated (Danish) entirety (26).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the Emergency Department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure

Hughes

Hazelwood

Lyrstedt

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is the most common symptom experienced when presenting to the emergency department (ED). Estimates indicate over half of all patients will present in pain. EDs typically focus on care process measures, such as time to first analgesic medication. Process-based metrics remove the patient from their own experience. Unfortunately, when patient-reported measures of pain care are used in the ED for quality improvement or research, they vary widely and often lack validation. Previous work has demonstrated that a modified version of the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire Revised Edition (APS POQ R) may provide an ideal patient-reported outcome measure for the adult ED population. However, previous work has left validation incomplete. In this multi-site, multistage research, we demonstrate the construct, convergent and divergent validity and the internal consistency of a modified version of the APS POQ R in adult patients presenting to two large, inner-city EDs with moderate to severe acute pain. After three stages of psychometric testing in 646 patients, we present a nine-question, three construct patient-reported outcome measure for moderate to severe pain in the adult emergency department, now known as the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire Revised for the ED (APS POQ RED).

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the Emergency Department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure

Hughes

Hazelwood

Lyrstedt

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In nine studies, both internal consistency and structural validity were scored as ''very good'' or ''adequate.'' [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] However, two studies were scored as ''doubtful'' 47 or ''inadequate'' 48 for internal consistency due to a lack of assessment of dimensionality. Similarly, hypotheses testing for construct validity was scored as ''very good'' in eight studies.…”

Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, hypotheses testing for construct validity was scored as ''very good'' in eight studies. 41,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Although cross-cultural validity was assessed as ''adequate'' to ''very good'' in six studies, 38,41,42,44,46,54 two studies 40,53 did not meet the criteria to appropriately assess this particular measurement property. This was due to inadequate sample size 40,53 and a lack of pre-testing of the tool for cultural relevance.…”

Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies assessed postoperative pain in the hospital setting in patients who received various types of surgeries, including general/mixed surgery, 38,39,41,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50]53 cardiac/cardiothoracic, 42,43 abdominal, 40 opthalmological, 52 orthopedic, 54 and prostatectomy/urological. 51 Postoperative pain was assessed at day 0 in five studies 39,44,46,49,52 and between day 1 and day 14 in the remaining 12 studies.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of multidimensional pain assessment tools used in postoperative adult patients: a systematic review of measurement properties

Lapkin

Ellwood

Diwan

et al. 2020

JBI Evidence Synthesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize the best available evidence relating to the measurement properties of the multidimensional pain assessment tools used to assess postoperative pain in adults.Introduction:Pain is a common and poorly managed occurrence in patients during the postoperative period. Currently, postoperative pain is usually evaluated with assessment tools that measure one dimension of pain, namely pain intensity, resulting in inadequate management of postoperative pain. It is important to understand the complex nature of pain by considering all dimensions for optimal postoperative pain management. Systematic, robust evidence is lacking regarding the most psychometrically reliable and valid multidimensional pain assessment tool for adult postoperative patients.Inclusion criteria:This systematic review considered all study types for inclusion. Studies were considered if they assessed the measurement properties of a multidimensional pain assessment tool in adult postoperative patients within two weeks post-surgery. The outcomes included measurement of at least one of the psychometric properties, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness.Methods:A three-step search strategy was undertaken, including a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and CINAHL databases performed in October 2019. We also searched Dissertation Abstracts International, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, MedNar, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify unpublished studies. The title and abstracts of the studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers against the inclusion/exclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the potential studies was assessed independently by three reviewers using the COSMIN checklist.Results:Seventeen studies involving five multidimensional postoperative pain assessment tools were included in the review: American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire–Revised; Brief Pain Inventory; Houston Pain Outcome Instrument; McGill Pain Questionnaire; and the Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Management Postoperative Pain Questionnaire. The two most commonly used tools were the Brief Pain Inventory and the American Pain Society Pain Outcomes Questionnaire–Revised, which were assessed in six studies each. The included studies mainly reported internal consistency reliability, with four of the five identified tools demonstrating high Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.72 to 0.92. However, the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument demonstrated mixed findings, with eight of the nine subscales having moderate to high reliability while the expectations about pain subscale had poor reliability (α=0.003).Conclusions:This review provides much needed information about the current tools used in many clinical, educational, and research settings. Of the five tools included in this review, the Brief Pain Inventory demonstrated strong evidence of psychometric validity and is recommended for use in assessing postoperative pain. ...

show abstract

“…To assess patient satisfaction with management of pain, the Turkish version of the Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) [16] was utilized. The The APS-POQ-R is a pain management quality improvement tool for use in adult hospitals.…”

Section: Postoperative Analgesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of bilateral erector spinae plane (ESP) block and superficial parasternal intercostal plane (S-PIP) + ESP block in acute post-sternotomy pain following cardiac surgery.Methods: Forty-seven patients aged between 18 and 80 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists class II-III due to undergo median sternotomy for cardiac surgery were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Following randomization into two groups, one group received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP and the other S-PIP plus ESP block. Morphine consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was the primary outcome of the study while NRS scores at rest, NRS scores when coughing, time taken until extubation, use of rescue analgesic, presence of nausea/vomiting, length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and patient satisfaction were secondary outcome measures.Results: Morphine use up to 24 h following surgery was statistically significantly different between the ESP block and ESP + S-PIP block groups (18.63 ± 6.60 [15.84-21.41] mg/24 h vs 14. 41 ± 5.38 [12.08-16.74] mg/24 h, p = 0.021). The ESP + S-PIP block group had considerably reduced pain scores compared to the ESP block group across all time points. Rescue analgesics were required in 21 (87.5%) patients in the ESP block group and seven (30.4%) in the ESP + S-PIP group (p < 0.001). PONV, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and time to extubation were similar between groups. Conclusions:In open cardiac surgery, the combination of ESP and S-PIP blocks lowers pain scores and postoperative morphine requirement of patients.

show abstract

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire in Surgical Patients

Cited by 8 publications

References 20 publications

Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the Emergency Department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure

Enhancing pain care with the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire for use in the Emergency Department (APS-POQ-RED): validating a patient-reported outcome measure

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of multidimensional pain assessment tools used in postoperative adult patients: a systematic review of measurement properties

Erector spinae plane block versus its combination with superficial parasternal intercostal plane block for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About