1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(98)70141-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-pin femoral fixation: a new technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
93
1
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
93
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a successful surgical technique in anterior knee instability associated with rupture of ACL [4,24]. Many different techniques have been described for ACL reconstruction, with intra-articular placement of the graft the most popular one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a successful surgical technique in anterior knee instability associated with rupture of ACL [4,24]. Many different techniques have been described for ACL reconstruction, with intra-articular placement of the graft the most popular one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Results of cyclic loading and load-to-failure test series (A: failure load before cyclic loading, B: failure load after cyclic loading) suspensory device, even though high fixation strength can be obtained, a very low stiffness in comparison to the normal ACL or BPTB was shown [23] and due to a bungee effect, the result of the long distances between the fixation sites and elastic materials, the widening of femoral tunnels would be expected [9,13,15]. In cases using cross-pins, as the cortical-cancellous suspensory devices, excellent strength and stiffness have been reported [8]; nonetheless, it has the shortcomings of bungee effects and slippage within cancellous bones [14]. Interference screws, as the compression fixation devices, could be fixed close to the normal ACL attachment site [22], and additional incisions are not required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nepaisant didelio skaièiaus klinikiniø tyrimø, kuriø metu buvo tiriamos priekinio kryþminio raiðèio traumos ir rekonstrukcijos, vis dar neaiðkios prieþastys, lemianèios sugráþimà á buvusá aktyvumo lygá. Beje, kitø tyrimø autoriai nenurodo tikslaus pacientø sugráþimo á buvusá fizinio aktyvumo lygá laiko, bet tik pageidautinà sugráþimo laikà (1,4,7,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Visi tyrimai, deja, buvo sukoncentruoti tik á sugráþimo faktà, bet ne sugráþimo laikà (1,4,7,9,10,(12)(13)(14)(15)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Lentelë Galutinis Ikdc áVertinimasunclassified
“…keturgalvio ðlaunies raumens ir ðlaunies lenkiamøjø raumenø susitraukimo jëgos deficità praëjus vidutiniðkai 30 mën. po operacijø (7).…”
Section: Lentelë Galutinis Ikdc áVertinimasunclassified