2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.91.012711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross sections for positron and electron collisions with an analog of the purine nucleobases: Indole

Abstract: Quantitative information about positron and electron collisions with nucleobases is required in charged-particle track simulations to accurately model and assess any radiation damage at the subcellular level in biological systems. However, scattering experiments have so far been restricted to the pyrimidine nucleobases. In this paper we report on total-cross-section measurements for positron impact on indole, a parent molecule of the purine nucleobases, at impact energies between 1 and 25 eV. We also present t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate in the DECS, Equation can be written as 0πdσel.2emitalicdΩ=s10πdσ1el.2emitalicdΩ+s10πdσ1el.2emitalicdΩ++sN0πdσNel.2emitalicdΩ, where Ω = 2πsin θ d θ with θ = [0 − pi], the polar angle; coefficients s i depend only on the atomic total ECS, therefore, 0πdσel.2emitalicdΩ=0π()s1dσ1el+s2dσ2el++sNdσNelitalicdΩ. The differential ECS is given as dσel=s1dσ1el+s2dσ2el++sNdσNel. We have checked that the integral of the left side of Equation leads exactly to the value of the total ECS given in the left side of Equation . In other studies, the DECS of the biomolecule is approximated by two separate contributions corresponding to incident charged particle suffering appreciable deviations and strong forward directionality; they are derived after some estimation on the relevance of ...…”
Section: Decs and Ecscontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate in the DECS, Equation can be written as 0πdσel.2emitalicdΩ=s10πdσ1el.2emitalicdΩ+s10πdσ1el.2emitalicdΩ++sN0πdσNel.2emitalicdΩ, where Ω = 2πsin θ d θ with θ = [0 − pi], the polar angle; coefficients s i depend only on the atomic total ECS, therefore, 0πdσel.2emitalicdΩ=0π()s1dσ1el+s2dσ2el++sNdσNelitalicdΩ. The differential ECS is given as dσel=s1dσ1el+s2dσ2el++sNdσNel. We have checked that the integral of the left side of Equation leads exactly to the value of the total ECS given in the left side of Equation . In other studies, the DECS of the biomolecule is approximated by two separate contributions corresponding to incident charged particle suffering appreciable deviations and strong forward directionality; they are derived after some estimation on the relevance of ...…”
Section: Decs and Ecscontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However, we are confident on the validity of the ECS for both charged particles even for energies as low as 10 eV; we have obtained very good agreement when comparing (not shown here in the present study) our ECS for electron on THF and PY with several experimental and theoretical data. On the other, our results differ from SCAR model cited in the literature even though we have used the same screening coefficients that take into account the geometrical positions of atoms forming the nucleobases. For positrons, we have shown relative differences as important as 250% for PY and THF and even at 10 keV; therefore, the total cross section will also increase allowing small mean free paths for the charged particle and hence an increase in the collision number.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The IAM-SCAR method was developed by Blanco and García (2009) and has been recently applied to numerous calculations of electron (see, e.g., Chiari et al, 2013a;2014a;and Sieradzka et al, 2014) and positron (e.g., Sanz et al, 2013b;Anderson et al, 2014;and Chiari et al, 2015) scattering cross sections from a variety of large polyatomic molecules and over an extensive impact energy range, typically from 1 to 1000 eV. Therefore, here we only briefly summarize the prominent aspects of this approach.…”
Section: Theory and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%