2017
DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cross-Sentence N-ary Relation Extraction with Graph LSTMs

Abstract: This research was conducted when the authors were at Microsoft Research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
403
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 453 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
403
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach to this problem would have been to use a distant supervision method using the CIViC knowledgebase as seed data. This approach was taken by Peng et al, who also attempted to extract relations across sentence boundaries [44]. They chose to focus only on point mutations and extracted 530 within sentence biomarkers and 1,461 cross-sentence biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach to this problem would have been to use a distant supervision method using the CIViC knowledgebase as seed data. This approach was taken by Peng et al, who also attempted to extract relations across sentence boundaries [44]. They chose to focus only on point mutations and extracted 530 within sentence biomarkers and 1,461 cross-sentence biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key challenge of non-spectral approaches is how to define the neighborhood of a node as the receptive field and various methods have been proposed, including adaptive weight matrices [21], uniformly sampling [36], and transition matrices [1]. A closely related research direction explores using RNNs for graph-structured data [57,65,70,82]. For example, Li et al [57] modified the Gate Recurrent Units (GRU) and proposed a gated GNN to learn node representations.…”
Section: Graph Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tai et al [70] proposed two types of tree-LSTM, generalizing the basic LSTM to tree-structure typologies, to predict the semantic relatedness of sentences. Peng et al [65] extended tree-LSTM by distinguishing different edge types in the graph and applied the model to the relation extraction problem in the Natural Language Processing (NLP) field. You et al [80] developed an RNN-based method for modeling complex distributions over multiple graphs and further generating graphs.…”
Section: Graph Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations